FLORIN WEBSITE
© JULIA
BOLTON HOLLOWAY, AUREO ANELLO
ASSOCIAZIONE, 1997-2024
MEDIEVAL: BRUNETTO
LATINO, DANTE
ALIGHIERI, SWEET NEW
STYLE: BRUNETTO
LATINO, DANTE ALIGHIERI, &
GEOFFREY CHAUCER || VICTORIAN:
WHITE
SILENCE: FLORENCE'S 'ENGLISH'
CEMETERY || ELIZABETH
BARRETT BROWNING || WALTER
SAVAGE LANDOR || FRANCES
TROLLOPE || || HIRAM POWERS
|| ABOLITION
OF SLAVERY || FLORENCE IN
SEPIA || CITY
AND BOOK CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
I, II, III, IV, V, VI,
VII
|| MEDIATHECA
'FIORETTA MAZZEI' || EDITRICE
AUREO
ANELLO CATALOGUE
|| FLORIN
WEBSITE || UMILTA
WEBSITE || LINGUE/LANGUAGES:
ITALIANO,
ENGLISH
|| VITA
New: Dante vivo || White Silence
RICHARD 'HENGIST' HORNE'S A NEW SPIRIT OF THE AGE
AND FLORENCE'S
'ENGLISH' CEMETERY

Benjamin Haydon, Wordsworth on Helvellyn
THOMAS SOUTHWOOD SMITH || LEONARD HORNER || WALTER
SAVAGE LANDOR || FRANCES
TROLLOPE || ELIZABETH BARRETT
BROWNING ||
Richard 'Hengist' 'Farthing' Horne,
whom Elizabeth Barrett Browning never met, conceived the idea of
writing a sequel to William Hazlitt's The Spirit of the Age, which had been
published in 1825, and which had included essays on Jeremy
Bentham, William Godwin, Samuel Coleridge, Sir Walter Scott,
Lord Byron, Robert Southey, William Wordsworth, William
Wilberforce, Leigh Hunt, Charles Lamb. Titled 'A New Spirit of the Age',
Horne's two volumes created a sort of Wikipedia of the living
writers and shapers of events in the 1840s, a kind of mutual
admiration (though sometimes villification) society, in which
these figures themselves wrote articles about each other.
Unlike Hazlitt's work, these volumes now included women, as both
subjects and as their editors. Among their portraits
- for the 1844 first edition also supplied these in fine
engravings - are those of Charles Dickens, Southwood Smith,
Walter Savage Landor, William and Mary Howitt, Mrs
Trollope, William Wordsworth, Leigh Hunt, Alfred Tennyson,
Harriet Martineau, Mrs Jameson, Miss E.B. Barrett (our Elizabeth
Barrett Browning), Robert Browning, Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton,
Mrs Shelley and Thomas Carlyle. These sixteen figures were all
associated with each other.
Of these figures, serendipitously, Southwood Smith, Walter
Savage Landor, Mrs Trollope, and Elizabeth Barrett Browning, all
find their resting places in Florence's 'English' Cemetery, and
Leonard Horner almost does so, with Leigh Hunt writing the
epitaph for Southwood Smith's tomb, Anna Jameson having
accompanied the Brownings from Paris to Pisa on their elopement,
Elizabeth in Lady
Geraldine's Courtship having proposed marriage to both
Tennyson and Browning, Charles Dickens' mistress'
sister being first governess to the orphaned Bice at Theodosia
Trollope's death and then second wife to Fanny Trollope's oldest
son, Thomas Adolphus Trollope, Isa Blagden nursing Lytton's son,
Robert, who became Viceroy of India, back to health at Bagni di
Lucca, then caring for the newly orphaned Pen Browning and,
later, orphaned Bice Trollope at Bellosguardo, as well as for
the demented Walter Savage Landor near Siena. Elizabeth's room
in Wimpole Street was hung with portraits, one of 'Wordsworth
upon Helvellyn', painted by the suicide Benjamin Haydon (NPG
1857), and two engravings from
A New Spirit of the Age
- of Tennyson and of Browning. These last two Elizabeth would
bring, on her elopement, to Italy.
Richard Horne's A New
Spirit of the Age combines the account of Thomas
Southwood Smith with that of Lord Ashley.
THOMAS SOUTHWOOD SMITH
To plunge into the infection of hospitals; to survey
the mansions of sorrow and pain; to take the gauge and
dimensions of misery, depression, and contempt; to remember
the forgotten, and to attend to the neglected. Burke
he spirit of the philosophy of antiquity offers a
striking contrast to that of the present age in the tendency
of the latter to diffuse itself among the people. In the whole
range of scientific or demonstrable knowledge which has been
grasped by human intelligence, we have now nothing approaching
to the old Esoteric and Exoteric doctrine. With results at
least as brilliant as those which have distinguished any
former age, the instruments of induction and experiment
continue to be used to extend the boundaries of knowledge; but
that which no former age has witnessed is the energy which is
now put forth to make the doctrines of science known and to
reach the masses how to apply them to their advantage. The men
at present in possession of the key of knowledge, value it
chiefly as it enables them to unlock treasures for universal
diffusion, and estimate their own claim to distinction and
honour by the measure in which they have enriched the world.
This spirit is strongly exemplified in the writings of Dr.
Southwood Smith, and the course of his public life. By nature
and education he seems to have been formed rather for the
retirement and contemplation of the study, than the active
business of the world. The bent of his mind led him at an
unusually early age to the investigation of the range of
subjects that relate more or less directly to intellectual and
moral philosophy; and, as not unfrequently happens, the
efforts of those around him, to give to his pursuits a widely
different direction only increased his love for those studies.
Having determined on the practice of medicine as a profession,
Dr. Southwood Smith found in the sciences which now demanded
his attention and still more in the structure and functions of
organized beings, studies congenial to his taste, and for
which his previous intellectual pursuits and habits had
prepared him. The contemplation of the wonderful processes
which constitute life, the exquisite mechanism, as far as that
mechanism can be traced by which they are performed, the
surprising adjustments and harmonies by which in a creature
like man such diverse and opposite actions are brought into
relation with each other and made to work in subserviency and
co-operation, and the Divine object of all - the communication
of sensation and intelligence as the inlets and instruments of
happiness, afforded the highest satisfaction to his mind. But
this beautiful world, into whose intimate workings his eye now
searched, presented itself to his view as a demonstration that
the Creative Power is infinite in goodness, and seemed to
afford, as if from the essential elements and profoundest
depths of nature, a proof of His love. Under these
impressions, he wrote, in 1814, during the intervals of his
college studies, the 'Divine Government', a work which at once
brought him into notice and established his reputation as an
original eloquent writer. It has now gone through many
editions, and has been widely circulated, and read with the
deepest interest by persons of all classes and creeds; there
is nothing sectarian in it; dealing only with great and
universal principles, it comprehends humanity and in some
respects indeed the whole sensitive and organic creation. The
style is singularly lucid; its tone is earnest, rising
frequently into strains of touching and pathetic eloquence; a
heartfelt conviction of the truth of every thought that is put
into words breathes throughout the whole, and a buoyant and
youthful spirit pervades it, imparting to it a charm which so
rivets the attention of the reader as to render him in many
instances unable to put down the book till finished, as if he
had been engaged in an exciting novel. Had the work been
written at a maturer age, some of this charm must have
vanished, and given place to a deeper consciousness of the woe
and pain that mingle with the joys of the present state. But
as it is, it has been no unimportant instrument in the hands
of those among whom it has chanced to fall, in keeping
distinctly before the view the greater happiness, as an end,
to the attainment of which the direct and only means must
often be pain. Many
instances are on record of the solace it has communicated to
the mourner, and the hope it has inspired in the mind when on
the brink of despair. While divines of the Church have read
and expressed their approbation of it, it has attracted the
attention of some of the most distinguished poets of the day:
Byron and Moore have recorded their admiration of it, and it
appears to have been the constant companion of Crabbe, and to
have soothed and brightened his last moments.
After the completion of his medical terms, Dr. Southwood Smith
spent several years in the practice of his profession at a
provincial town in the west of England, near his place of
birth, and in the midst of a small but highly cultivated and
affectionate circle of friends, devoting himself with unabated
ardour to his favourite studies. On his removal to London, he
attached himself to one of the great metropolitan hospitals,
that he might enlarge his experience in his profession. He was
soon appointed physician to the Eastern Dispensary, and in a
few years afterwards, to the London Fever Hospital. Called
upon by the latter appointment to treat on so large a scale
one of the most formidable diseases which the physician has to
encounter, he applied himself to its study with a zeal not to
be abated by two attacks of the malady in his own person, so
severe that his life on each occasion was despaired of. The
result of several years' laborious investigation is given in
his 'Treatise on Fever', which was at once pronounced to be
'one of the most able of the philosophical works that have
aided the advancement of the science of medicine during the
last half century'; and its reputation has risen with time. It
has had a wide circulation on the Continent, over India and in
America, in the medical schools of which it has become a
textbook, while in this country high medical authority has
pronounced it to be 'the best work on fever that ever flowed
from the pen of physician in any age or country'.
Dr. Southwood Smith assisted in the formation of the Westminster Review, and
wrote the article on 'Education' in the first number. For many
years he was a regular contributor, and it was here that his
paper on the state of the Anatomical Schools first appeared,
which attracted so much attention that it was reprinted in
form of a pamphlet, under the title of 'The Use of the Dead
for the Living'. In this form it passed through several
editions, and a copy was sent to every member of both houses
of Parliament. The evils that must necessarily result to the
country by withholding from the medical profession the means
of obtaining anatomical and physiological knowledge were so
clearly pointed out in this pamphlet, and the perils
inseparable from the permission of such a class as the
resurrection-men (the most horrible results of which were soon
afterwards actually realized), so forcibly depicted, while at
the same time a remedy adequate to meet the difficulties of
the case was suggested and explained, that the Legislature was
induced to take up the subject, and after appointing a
Committee of Inquiry, to pass the existing law, which has put
an effectual stop to the trade of body-snatching and the
horrible crime of Barking; but, unfortunately, from a defect
in the Act, the anatomical schools are often placed, though
quite unnecessarily, in a state of considerable embarrassment.
Dr. Smith laboured with equal earnestness, but less success,
to obtain a revision of the present regulations concerning
quarantine, which he regards as unworthy of a country that has
made any progress in science, having their origin in ignorance
and superstition worthy of the Middle Ages; aiming at an
object which is altogether chimerical, and which, if it had
any real existence, would be just as much beyond human power
as the control of the force and direction of the winds. Yet
these regulations are still allowed grievously to embarrass
commerce, at the cost of hundreds of thousands of pounds
annually.
The articles on 'Physiology and Medicine' in the early numbers
of the Penny Cyclopedia
are from the pen of this author, and the success of the
treatise on 'Animal Physiology', written at the request of the
Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, suggested the
idea of treating this subject in a still more elaborate and
comprehenseive manner, and led to the publication of the
'Philosophy of Health'. The first words of the introduction to
this work thus express the comprehensive nature of the subject
which it embraces: -
The object of the present work is to give a
brief and plain account of the structure and functions of
the Body, chiefly with reference to health and disease. This
is intended to be introductory to an account of the
constitution of the Mind, chiefly with reference to the
development and direction of its powers.
The two volumes already published, aim at establishing a
series of general rules for health (the word 'health' being
applied in its widest sense), by popularly explaining the
nature of the substances of which the physical part of man is
compounded; describing the various structures and organs of
the body, and the different functions they perform; and
deducing thence the laws which the creature is enjoined by the
principles of its creation to obey. This is merely the basis
of a higher philosophy, which rising from the physical, shall,
in regular sequence, proceed to the mental, trace their mutual
relation and dependence, and endeavour to deduce from the
exposition of this nature of each - as far as their nature can
be comprehended by mortal intelligence - the rules for the
utmost development and progression of both.
The first volume comprises a most interesting view of life in
all organized bodies, commencing from an imperceptible germ,
and ascending from the lichen on the rock, to man himself. The
distinction between the two great divisions of organized life,
between that which only grows - the organic, and that which
not only grows, but moves and feels - the animal superadded to
the organic - is traced with the hand of a master. Equally
masterly is the rapid view of the means adopted to render
voluntary motion possible; the complication of structure
requisite to that one faculty; the apparatus constructed to
produce sensation; the elevation of every faculty down to the
lowest, by the addition of each higher faculty; the
indispensable necessity and uses of pain not only to health,
but to life itself; and the indication of the processes by
which nature trains the mind to perceive and think. The
concluding passage of this portion of the work is one of
remarkable power, in which a general view is exhibited of the
physiological progress of a human being, from its first
appearance in the embryo state, until the final extinction of
life, and the subjection of the inanimate body to the material
laws which are to decompose it. Expositions of the function of
circulation, digestion, and nutrition follow, equally
characterized by fullness, clearness, and conciseness.
The style of this work is distinguished by terseness and
simplicity; it would be difficult to find a useless word, and
very few epithets are employed, as though the number and
variety of ideas to be imparted rendered condensation
essential: in the arrangment there is great precision, subject
after subject arising gradually and naturally. Few technical
terms are employed, and a full explanation is given to those
which are introduced. A perfect command of the subject is
evinced throughout: and its exposition is at once profound and
simple, calculated alike to instruct the ignorant, and by the
striking nature of the description and the novelty of their
applications, to interest even those to whom the facts are not
new. Much of the matter contained in these volumes is
original, and even that which is taken out of the common
treasury of science is disposed in a new manner, and exhibited
in new relations of great interest and importance. Scattered
phenomena which might be culled out of various works on
Anatomy, Physiology, and Mental Philosophy, are here brought
together and systematized; displayed as a series, traced from
their germs, and followed onwards to their highest
manifestations; arranged so as to show their relation to one
another, and their influence one on the other, thence deducing
the means of developing the united powers towards their utmost
point of progression.
Many felicitous instances of scientific generalization and of
eloquent description and appeal might be referred to in
exemplification. It has been well said by a philosophical
reviewer, that the '"Natural History of Death", as a
composition, has much of that singular and melancholy beauty
wherewith a painter of genius would invest the personification
of mortality'. The following appeal to mothers as been
compared to the fervid eloquence of Rousseau, which aroused
women to a sense of the physical obligations of the maternal
character; but here the earnest call is for mental and moral
exertion: -
I appeal to every woman whose eye may rest
on these pages. I ask of you, what has ever been done for
you to enable you to understand the physical and mental
constitution of that human nature, the care of which is
imposed on you? In what part of the course of your education
was instruction of this kind introduced? Over how large a
portion of your education did it extend? Who were your
teachers? What have you profited by their lessons? What
progress have you made in the acquisition of the requisite
information? Were you at this moment to undertake the
guidance of a new-born infant to health, knowledge, goodness
and happiness, how would you set about the task? How would
you regulate the influence of external agents upon its
delicate, tender, and highly irritable organs, in such a
manner as to obtain from them healthful stimulation, and
avoid destructive excitement? What natural and moral objects
would you select as the best adapted to exercise and develop
its opening faculties? What feelings would you check, and
what cherish? How would you excite aims; how would you apply
motives? How would you avail yourself of pleasure as a final
end, or as the means to some further end? And how would you
deal with the no less formidable instrument of pain? What is
your own physical, intellectual, and moral state, as
especially fitting you for this office? What is the measure
of your own self-control, without a large portion of which
no human being ever yet exerted over the infant mind any
considerable influence for good?
This earnest passage at once serves to give an idea of the
style of the work and to explain one of its chief aims: and
with it the present short account of the 'Philosophy of
Health' must conclude, but not before a hope has been
expressed that an undertaking so important and so well begun,
will not much longer be left unfinished.
Dr. Southwood Smith was the friend and physician of Bentham.
The venerable and unaffected philanthropist, fully
appreciating the importance of anatomical science, and
lamenting the prejudice against dissection, gave his own body
to Dr. Smith, charging him to devote it to the ordinary
purposes of science. His friend fulfilled his desire, and
delivered the first lecture over the body - with a clear and
unfaltering voice, but with a face as white as that of the
dead philosopher before him. Alive, so cheerful and serene -
serene for ever now and nothing more. The lecture was
delivered on June 9, 1832, in the Webb-street School of
Anatomy. Dr. Smith availed himself of the occasion, and his
biographer has made this lecture the concluding part of the
Memoir which has been prefixed to the uniform edition of
Bentham's works just published. The head and face were
preserved by a peculiar process, but the latter being found
painful in expression, is covered with a wax mask admirably
executed and a correct likeness. The skeleton also was
preserved; and the whole clothed in the ordinary dress worn by
the philosopher (according to his own express desire),
presenting him as nearly as possible as he was while living.
Seated smiling in a large mahogany case with a glass front,
the homely figure, with its long snow-white hair,
broad-brimmed hat, and thick ash-plant walking-stick, resides with Dr.
Southwood Smith, and may be seen by any one who takes an
interest in the writings and character of Jeremy Bentham.
See also http://www.sijmen.nl/filo/bentham.html
The University of
London treasures the 'auto-icon' of Jeremy Bentham as its
founder (above). We recall that Robert Browning's Dissenting
father participated in the founding of that University in order
to enroll his son. Robert Browning only attended that university
one day, Balliol's honorary degree being more to his liking.
The essay next discusses Lord Ashley, noting that
Southwood Smith served on the commission concerning Child
Labour.
Lord
Ashley, the eldest son of the Earl of Shaftsbury and member
for Dorsertshire, commenced his career in that cause with
which his public life has become identified, by undertaking
the charge of Mr Sadler's Factory Bill in the House of
Commons. The invention of the spinning-jenny and the
power-loom not only altered the whole process of manufactures,
but withdrew the operatives from their own dwellings, and
collected them in numbers in great buildings called Factories.
The invention of machinery was attended with another result:
it created a demand for the comparatively inexpensive labour
of children, their small fingers being found best adapted
to to work in combination with it. Very young children,
of both sexes, were therefore employed in great numbers,
together with adult labourers, and as their servants, and were
moreover compelled to work the same number of hours, whether
those amounted to twelve, fourteen, or sixteen, or even all
night. It was alleged that children of tender ages placed
under these unnatural circumstances were grievously and
irreparably injured in their physical constitution; that they
were cruelly treated by their taskmasters; that their morals
were early corrupted; that they were growing up in a state of
absolute ignorance. It was universally admitted that the
efforts which the Legislature had hitherto made for their
protection had failed, and every existing enactment become a
dead letter. It was in this state of things that Lord Ashley,
in 1833, took charge of Mr Sadler's Bill, the object of which
was to limit the hours of work, of all under eighteen, in
Factories, to ten hours daily. This was met by the objection
that such a measure must necessarily put the same limit on the
labour of adults. A Commission was accordingly appointed;
first to ascertain the facts of the case as regarded the
children, and, secondly, to inquire whether it would not be
practicable to devise a measure for the protection of children
without interfering with the liberty of all the operatives.
Fifteen Commissioners were appointed and divided into five
sections, each consisting of three Commissioners (two civil
and one medical) and of these Mr Thomas Tooke, Mr Chadwick,
and Dr Southwood Smith, formed the Central Board, to direct
the inquiry and report the result. Their report was: -
That the children employed in all the
principal branches of manufacture throughout the kingdom
work the same number of hours as the adults; that the
effects of such labour, in great numbers of instances, are
permanent deterioration of the physical constitution, the
production of disease, often wholly irremediable, and the
exclusion by means of excessive fatigue from the means of
obtaining education. That children at the ages when they
suffer these injuries not being free agents, but let out to
hire, their wages being appropriated by their parents,
therefore a case is made out for the interference of the
legislature in their behalf.
The Factory Act of 1833 was founded on this Report.
and four Inspectors and a considerable number of
Sub-Inspectors were appointed to enforce obedience to its
enactments. The results are highly important.
The
existing Act, which fixes the youngest age at which children
can be employed, and the extent of their hours of labour, and
which requires education as a condition of employment, is
(unlike its predecessors) obeyed; and although the clause in
the Bill prepared by the Commissioners providing for the
erection of schools and the payment of teachers, was struck
out in the House of Lords on the motion of the Earl of
Shaftsbury, Lord Ashley's father, yet with all its
imperfections the present Act has led to an amelioration in
the treatment and an improvement in the physical condition and
moral character of this vast juvenile population, such as was
never before effected by an Act of Parliament; while the
benefits resulting from it to all parties, the employers no
less than the employed, are not only rapidly multiplying and
extending, but are becoming more and more the subjects of
general acknowledgement and gratulation. There is reason to
believe that the total number employed in factory labour in
the United Kingdom is little short of 1,000,000.*
________
*From a Return furnished by Mr Saunders, one of the
Factory Inspectors, it appears that in his district alone,
which is by no means one of the largest, the total number
employed in Factory labour is 106,509. Among these there are
45.958 young persons and children coming under the regulations
of the Factory Act. It appears, further, that while there were
before the present Act, as far as the Inspector could learn,
only two schools in his whole district, at which about 200
children may have been educated, the actual number at present
attending schools is 9,316. The Factory Act has diminished the
number of young children, as operatives, and increased that of
adults.
_________
New
fields of labour had opened to Lord Ashley at every step of
his progress. He had already earned the honourable designation
of the general guardian of the children of the poor, as the
Lord Chancellor is of the children of the rich. He was
satisfied that there were oppressions and sufferings of an
aggravated character, and on a large scale, in occupations
widely different from those of the factory, and which required
investigation the more because the places of work, in which
some of the most important of these employments are carried
on, are widely inacessible to the public. The apprehension
inseperable from a mind, at once earnest and diffident, that
he should fail to elicit the truth, and to place it so
strongly before the public and the legislature, as to command
grievance, was strongly marked in the opening of his speech on
August 4, 1840, for the appointment of a Commission of Inquiry
into the Employment of Children in Mines, Collieries, and
other occupations not regulated by the Factory Acts.
'It is, Sir', said he, 'with feelings somewhat akin
to despair that I now rise to bring before the House, the
motion of which I have given notice. I cannot but entertain
misgivings, that I shall not be able to bring under the
attention of the House this subject, which has now occupied so
large a portion of my public life, and which are concentrated in one hour,
the labours of years. I have long contemplated this
effort which I am now making; I had long resolved that, so
soon as I could see the Factory children, as it were, safe in
harbour, I would undertake a new task . . . I am now
endeavouring to obtain an inquiry into the actual
circumstances and condition of another large part of our
juvenile population . . . I wish,' continued he, 'to preserve
and cherish the physical energies of these poor children, and
to cultivate and improve their moral part, both of which, be
they taken separately or conjointly, are essential to the
peace, security, and progress of the empire . . . It is
instructive to observe, how we compel, as it were, vice and
misery with one hand, and endeavour to repress them with the
other; but the whole course of our manufacturing system tends
to these results; you engage children from their earliest and
tenderest years in these long, painful, and destructive
occupations; when they have approached to manhood, they have
outgrown their employments, and they are turned upon the world
without moral, without professional education; the business
they have learned, avails them nothing; to what can they turn
their hands for a maintenance? - the children, for instance,
who have been taught to make pins, having reached fourteen or
fifteen years of age, are unfit to make pins any longer; to
procure an honest livelihood then becomes to them almost
impossible; the governors of prisons will tell you, the
relieving-officers will tell you, that the vicious resort to
plunder and prostitution; the rest sink down into a hopeless
pauperism. I desire to remove these spectacles of suffering
and oppression from the eyes of the poorer classes, or at
least to ascertain if we can do so; these things perplex the
peaceable, and exasperate the discontented; they have a
tendency to render capital odious, for wealth is known to them
only by its oppressions; they judge of it by what they see
immediately around them; they know but little beyond their own
narrow sphere; they do not extend their view over the whole
surface of the land, and so perceive and understand the
compensating advantages that wealth and property bestow on the
community at large. Sir, with so much ignorance on one side,
and so much oppression on the other, I have never wondered
what perilous errors and bitter hatreds have prevailed; but I
have wondered much, and been very thankful that they have
prevailed so little.'
Lord Ashley concluded by declaring that it was his
object to appeal to, and excite public opinion, 'for where we
cannot legislate,' said he, 'we may exhort; and laws may fail
where example will succeed'.
I must appeal to the Bishops and Ministers
of the Church of England, nay, more, to the Ministers of
every denomination, to urge on the hearts of their hearers,
the mischief and the danger of these covetous and cruel
practices; I trust they will not fall short of the zeal and
eloquence of a distinguised prelate in a neighbouring
country, who, in these beautiful and emphatic words,
exhorted his hearers to justice and mercy:- 'Open your
eyes,' said the Prince Archbishop Primate of Normandy, 'and
behold: parents and masters demand of these young plants to
produce fruit in the season of blossoms. By excessive and
prolonged labour they exhaust the rising sap, caring but
little that they leave them to vegetate and perish on a
withered and tottering stem. Poor little children! may the
laws hasten to extend their protection over your existence
and may posterity read
with astonishment, on the front of this age, so satisfied
with itself, that in these days of progress and discovery
there was needed an iron law to forbid the murder of
children by excessive labour' . . . My grand object
is to bring these children within reach of education. I will
say, though possibly I may be charged with cant and
hypocrisy, that I have been bold enough to undertake this
task, because I must regard the objects of it as beings
created, as ourselves, by the same Maker, redeemed by the
same Saviour, and destined to the same immortality; and it
is, therefore, in this spirit, and with these sentiments,
that I now venture to entreat the countenance of this House,
and the co-operation of Her Majesty's Ministers; first to
investigate, and ultimately to remove, these sad evils,
which press so deeply and so extensively on such a large and
interesting portion of the human race.
This appeal, distinguished throughout by an earnest
simplicity of language, was answered by the cordial support of
the Government, and the immediate appointment of a Commission
of Inquiry, consisting of a Board of Commissioners, whose
office it was to visit the districts and t report thereon. The
field of inquiry prescribed by the terms of the Commission,
comprehended the mines and collieries of the United Kingdom,
and all trades and manufactures whatever in which children
work together in numbers, not included under the Factories
Regulation Act. The mass of evidence sent up to the Central
Board from twenty gentlemen, working day and night, in
different parts f the country, with the utmost energy and
without intermission for many consecutive months, speaks for
itself. Fortunately, the commissioners were men of energy
practised in business. The Chairman, Mr Thomas Tooke, who had
held the same situation in the Factory Commission, possessed
the confidence of the commercial and manufacturing portion of
the country. Mr Horner,
_________
From the Wikipedia:
Leonard Horner
(January 17, 1785 – March 5, 1864), Scottish geologist,
brother of Francis Horner, was born
in Edinburgh.
Horner was a
'radical educational reformer' who was involved in the
establishment of University College School. His
father, John Horner, was a linen merchant in Edinburgh, and
Leonard, the third and youngest son, entered the university of
Edinburgh in 1799. There in the course of the next four years
he studied chemistry and mineralogy, and gained a love of
geology from Playfairs Illustrations of the ilullonian
Theory. At the age of nineteen he became a partner in a
branch of his father's business, and went to London. In 1808
he joined the newly formed Geological Society of London and
two years later was elected one of the secretaries. Throughout
his long life he was ardently devoted to the welfare of the
society; he was elected president in 1846 and again in 1860.
In 1811 he read his first paper On the Mineralogy of the
Malvern Hills (Trans. Geol. Soc. vol. i.) and
subsequently communicated other papers on the Brine-springs at
Droitwich, and the Geology of the S.W. part of
Somersetshire. He was elected fellow of the Royal
Society in 1813. In 1815 he returned to Edinburgh to take
personal superintendence of his business, and while there
(1821) he was instrumental in founding the Edinburgh School of
Arts 101 the instruction of mechanics, and he was one of the
founders of the Edinburgh Academy. In 1827 he was invited to
London to become warden of the London University, an office
which he held for four years; he then resided at Bonn for two
years and pursued the study of minerals and rocks,
communicating to the Geological Society on his return a paper
on the Geology of the Environs of Bonn, and another On
the Quantity of Solic Matter suspended in the Water of the
Rhine. In 1833 he was appointed one
of the commissioners to inquire into the employment of
children in the factories of Great Britain, and he was
subsequently selected as one of the inspectors. In
later years he devoted much attention to the geological
history of thi alluvial lands of Egypt; and in 1843 he
published his Life of his brother Francis. He died in
London on the 5th of March 1864. See Memoir of Leonard
Horner, by Katherine M Lyell (1890) (privately printed).
He was to have
been buried beside his wife in Florence's 'English' Cemetery
and the inscription on her tombstone states this, his own
grave space next to hers having been purchased by the family
for this purpose.
__________
and Mr Saunders,
two of the Factory Inspectors, had already spent many years in
pursuing investigations analogous to those which were now to
be made; and Dr. Southwood Smith was qualified as a
physiologist and physician, to appreciate the influence of
early labour on the physical and moral condition of children.
But the very extent and completeness of the evidence
transmitted to the Central Board, would have caused its
failure as an instrument of legislation, but for the manner in
which it was decided to deal with it. The subject was divided
into two parts, Mines and Manufactures. The mines were
subdivided into collieries and metallic mines, and the
manufactures into the larger branches of industry, such as
metal.wares, earthenware, glass-making, lace-making, hosiery,
calico-printing, paper-making, weaving, &c.
Those who have closely examined the two small volumes, into
which compass are compressed and admirably arranged the main
facts contained in the enormous folios, can alone appreciate
the amount of labour involved in this undertaking, and will
not fail to recognize in the lucid order and condensed style,
the hand of Dr. Southwood Smith, on whom this portion of the
labours of the Commission principally devolved. He did not
shrink from the task, though nearly every minute of the day
was absorbed by a fatiguing profession, sustained through the
long hours taken from rest and sleep, by the conviction that
the usefulness of this work would afford a heart-felt
compensation for its labor. The anticipation was fully
realized. When the Report on Mines was laid on the table of
the House, astonishment and horror were universal. No such
outrages on humanity had been discovered since the disclosure
of the treatment of Negro slaves. It was truly said that this
Report resembled a volume of travels in a remote and barbarous
country, so little had been previously known of the state of
things it described. Dark passages to seams of coal, scarcely
thirty inches in height, not larger than a good-sized drain,
through which children of both sexes, and of all ages, from
seven years old and upwards, toiled for twelve hours daily,
and sometimes more, obliged to crawl on 'all-fours', dragging
after them loaded corves or carts, fastened to their bodies by
a belt, a chain passing between the legs; - infants of four,
five, and six years old, carried down on their parents' knees
to keep the air-doors, sitting in a little niche scooped out
in the coal, for twelve hours daily, along, in total darkness,
except when the corves, lighted by their solitary candle,
passed along, and some of them during the winter never seeing
the light of day, except on Sunday; - girls and women hewing
coals like men, and by the side of men; - girls and woman
clothed in nothing more than loose trousers, and these often
in rags, working side by side with men in a state of utter
nudity; - girls of tender age carrying on their backs along
unrailed roads, often over their ankles, and sometimes up to
their knees in water, burdens of coal, weighing from 3/4 cwt
to 3 cwt, from the bottom of the mine to the bank, up steep
ladders, the height ascended and the distance along the roads
added together, exceeding the height of St Paul's Cathedral';
married women, and women about to become mothers, dragging or
bearing on their shoulders similar enormous loads, up to the
very moment when forced to leave this 'horse-work' to be
'drawn up' to give birth to their helpless offspring, -
themselves as helpless - at the pit's-mouth, and sometimes
even in the pit itself; - boys of seven and eight years old,
bound, till the age of twenty-one, apprentices to the
colliers, receiving until that age, as the reward for their
labour, nothing but food, clothing, and lodging, working side
by side with young men of their own age, free labourers, the
latter receiving men's wages; - boys employed at the
steam-engines for letting down and drawing up the work-people;
- ropes employed for this service obviously and acknowledgedly
unsafe; - accidents of a fearful nature constantly occurring;
- the most ordinary precautions to guard against danger
neglected; a collier's chances of immunity from mortal peril
being about equal to those of a soldier on the field of battle
- for all this neither the legislature nor the public were at
all prepared, nor were they better prepared for the last two
conclusions deduced by the Commissioners, as the result of the
whole body of evidence, namely: -
That partly by the severity of the labour
and the long hours of work, and partly through the unhealthy
state of the place of work, this employment, as at present
carried on in all the districts, deteriorates the physical
constitution; in the thin-seam mines, more especially, the
limbs become crippled and the body distorted; and in general
the muscular powers give way, and the work-people are
incapable of following their occupation, at an earlier
period of life than is common in other branches of industry.
- That by the same causes, the seeds of painful and mortal
disease are often sown in childhood and youth; these, slowly
but steadily developing themselves, assume a formidable
character between the ages of thirty and forty; and each
generation of this class of the ppulation is commonly
extinct soon after fifty.
When on June 7, 1842, Lord Ashley moved for leave to bring in
a Bill, founded on this Report, there was an unusually large
attendance of members. After expressing his warm
acknowledgements to the late Administration, 'not only for the
Commission which they gave, but for the Commissioners whom
they appointed, gentlemen who had performed the duties
assigned them with unrivalled skill, fidelity and zeal,' he
proceeded in an elaborate speech, listened to throughout by a
silent and deeply attentive House, to detail the most
important points of the physical miseries and the moral
deterioration of large classes of the community, that the
motion was granted without a dissentient voice. Members on
every side vied with each other in cordial assent and sympathy
with the measure. The contemporary press echoed the tone; the
manner of the speech was deservedly eulogized for its freedom
from all sickly sentimentalities, useless recriminations, and
philanthropic clap-traps; for the way in which the startling
and impressive facts of the case were simply stated and
lucidly arranged, and in which each was made to bear upon the
nature and necessity of the projected remedy, while blessings
were invoked in the name of humanity, on the man by whom this
was done and done so well. 'The laurels of party', it was
truly declared, 'were worthless, compared with the wreath due
to this generous enterprise.'
Lord Ashley's Bill proposed a total exclusion of girls and
women from the labour of mines and collieries; a total
prohibition of male children from this labour, no boy being
allowed to descend into a mine, for the purpose of performing
any kind of work therein, under thirteen years of age; a total
prohibition of apprenticeship to this labour, and a provision
that no person, other than a man between twenty-one and fifty
years of age, shall have charge of the machinery by which the
work-people are let down and drawn up the shafts.
The history of the mutilated progress of this Bill through
both Houses, has now to be recorded.
The first point was unanimously acceded to in the Commons; the
second was altered by the substitution of the age of ten, for
that of thirteen; the concession, however, being neutralized
as far as was practicable, by the provision, that no boy under
thirteen should work on any two successive days; the third was
materially altered by the addition of the word 'underground',
thus allowing the collier to take apprentices provided he
worked them on the surface; the fourth was altered by omitting
the limitation to fifty, thus permitting the lives of all who
work in mines, to be placed in the hands of aged and decrepit
men.
Thus changed, each change, it will be observed, being directly
against the interest and safety of the work-people, the Bill
passed the Commons. In the House of Lords, the whole measure
was met with a spirit of hostility as unexpected as it was
unanimous, and alas! successful. It had been forgotten that
the mines and collieries of the kingdom belong, with very few
exceptions, to the great landed proprietors - the same noble
lords who had now to decide on the fate of the Bill. For some
time it was impossible to get any member of that noble House
to take any charge of the business. At length, Lord Devon,
from a feeling of shame to which so many had showed themselves
insensible, volunteered to do what he could to conduct the
Bill through its perilous course. In this noble House, even
the prohibition to work female children, and married women,
and women about to become mothers, was murmured at, but no
member ventured to propose an alteration of this part of the
measure. the clause prohibiting apprentceship was expunged,
saving that a provision was retained that no apprenticeship
should be contracted under ten years of age, nor for a longer
period than eight years. The clause limiting the labour of
boys under thirteen to alternate days, was expunged. And the
clause regulating the age of the persons that work the
machinery for conveying the work-people up and down the
shafts, which the Commons had altered on the one hand so as to
permit decrepit men to perform this office, the Lords now
altered on the other, so as to entrust it to boys.
Early in the following Session, the commissioners presented
their second Report on Trades and Manufactuers, drawn up on
the same elaborate plan, written with the same clearness and
calmness, and exhibiting in some respects a still more
melancholy, though not so startling a picture of the condition
of large classes of our industrial population. It discloses in
its full extent the mischief done to the former Bill by the
expulsion of the clause prohibiting apprenticeship; for it
proves that the oppressions and cruelties perpetrated under
this legal sanction in mines and collieries, is even exceeded
in some trades and manufactures. The words of the Report
relative to this subject, ought to sink deep into the mind and
heart of the country. After stating that in some trades, more
especially those requiring skilled workmen, apprentices are
bound by legal indentures usually at the age of fourteen, and
for a term of seven years, the Commissioners continue: -
But by far the greater number are bound
without any prescribed legal forms, and in almost all these
cases they are required
to serve their masters, at whatever age they may commence
their apprenticeship, until they attain the age of
twenty-one, in some instances in employments in
which there is nothing
deserving the name of skill to be acquired, and in
other instances in employments in which they are taught to make only one
particular part of the article manufactured; so that at
the end of their servitude they are altogether unable to
make any one article of their trade in a complete state.
A large proportion of these apprentices consist of orphans,
or are the children of widows, or belong to the poorest
families, and frequently are apprenticed by Boards of
Guardians. The term of servitude of these apprentices may
and sometimes does commence as early as seven years of age,
and is often passed under circumstances of great hardship
and ill-usage, and under the condition that,
during the greater part, if not the whole, of their term,
they receive nothing for their labour beyond food and
clothing. This system of apprenticeship is most prevalent in
the districts around Wolverhampton, and is most abused by
what are called 'small masters', persons who are either
themselves journeymen, or who, if working on their own
account, work with their apprentices. In these districts it
is the practice among some of the employers to engage the
services of children by a simple written agreement, on the
breach of which the defaulter is liable to be committed to
jail, and in fact often is so without regard to age.
The Report on
Wolverhampton states, that 'within the last four years five
hundred and eight-four males and females, all under age, have
been committed to Stafford jail for breach of contract'. The
following passage concerning the treatment of the children,
completes the picture: -
In the cases in which the children are the
servants of the workmen, and under their sole control, the
master apparently knowing nothing about their treatment, and
certainly taking no charge of it, they are almost always
roughly, very often harshly, and sometimes cruelly used; and
in the districts around Wolverhampton in particular, the
treatment of them is oppressive and brutal to the last
degree.
Wolverhampton, it
will be remembered, is the centre of the iron manufactures in
South Staffordshire, and the words of this Report in their
simple conciseness, lay bare a state of things, which, that it
should exists at this day,
just as if no Commission had been established, and no facts
made known to the public, in the centre of a country which
calls itself civilized, is an outrage to humanity. The
descriptions of this district exhibit scenes of actual misery
among the children, far surpassing the inventions of fiction.
Here, in the busy workshops, the Assistant-Commissioner saw
the poor apprentice boys at their daily labour; their anxious
faces, looking three times their age, on deformed and stunted
bodies, showing no trace of the beauty and gladness of
childhood or youth: their thin hands and long fingers toiling
at the vice for twelve, fourteen, sixteen, sometimes more
hours out of the twenty-four; yet with all their toil, clothed
in rags, shivering with cold, half-starved or fed on offal,
beaten, kicked, abused, struck with locks, bars, hammers, or
other heavy tools, burnt with showers of sparks from red-hot
irons, pulled by the hair and ears till be the blood ran down,
and in vain imploring for mercy; - and all this is going on now.
Why should it go on? Apprenticeship is not an order of Nature.
It is an arrangement, good in itself, made by the law, and the
law should therefore regulate it beneficently. The necessity
of interfering between parents and children has been admitted,
and in some degree acted upon in the factories, mines, and
collieries. It is equally necessary in trades and
manufactures; and much more is it necessary to interfere
between masters and apprentices. The natural instinct has even
still some power. The mothers do carry their over-toiled
children to their beds when they are too tired to crawl to
them, - but no one cares for the wretched apprentice. He may
lie down and die when his 'long day's work' is done, and his
master can get another, and a sovereign besides, at the
workhouse.
It is difficult to make an abridgement of the concise and
graphic descriptions given in these Reports of the physical
and moral condition of the persons employed in the various
branches of industry included in the inquiry; and it is the
less necessary, because the means of information are placed
within the reach of all; an octavor volume* having been
published by direction of the
_____________
* 'Physical and Moral Conditions of the Children and Young
Persons employed in Mines and Manufactures. Illustrated by
extracts from the Reports of the Commissioners' - London:
Published for her Majesty's Stationery Office, by J.W. Parker,
West Strand. 1843.
_____________
Government, at the desire of the House of Commons,
containing verbatim the most important portions of the
Reports. The individuals composing these classes are to be
numbered not by thousands, but by millions; yet what is the
weighed, the solemn verdict given by this Commission as to
their moral condition? Every word has been deeply considered -
and should so be read. The Commissioners say, in their general
conclusion: -
That the parents, urged by poverty or
improvidence, generally seek employment for the children as
soon as they can earn the lowest amount of wages; paying but
little regard to the probable injury of their children's
health by early labour, and still less regard to the certain
injury of their minds by early removal from school, or even
by the total neglect of their education; seldom, when
questioned expressing any desire for the regulation of the
hours of work, with a view to the protection and welfare of
their children, but constantly expressing the greatest
apprehension lest any legislative restriction should deprive
them of the profits of their children's labour; the natural
parental instinct to provide, during childhood, for the
child's subsistence, being, in great numbers of instances,
wholly extinguished, and the order of nature even reversed -
the children supporting, instead of being supported by,
their parents.
That the means of instruction are so grievously defective
that in all the districts great numbers of children are
growing up without any religious, moral, or intellectual
training; nothing being done to train them to habits of
order, sobriety, honesty, and forethought, or even to
restrain them from vice and crime.
That there is not a single district in which the means of
instruction are adequate to the wants of the people, while
in some it is insufficient for the education of one third of
the population. That as a natural consequence of this
neglect, and of the possession of unrestrained liberty at an
early age, when few are capable of self-government, great
numbers of these children and young persons acquire in
childhood and youth habits which utterly destroy their
future health, usefulness, and happiness.
The details forming the basis of these general
statements, - which are cold abstractions, necessarily
incapable of presenting the living action and passion of the
countless individuals from whom they are derived, - exhibit a
degree of widespread ignorance, vice, and suffering,
for the disclosure of which the country was wholly unprepared.
For this national moral evil there is no remedy but a national
education; and the prsentation of the Report was followed, on
the part of Lord Ashley, by a motion for 'A Moral and
Religious Education of the Working Classes'. He sustained his
motion by a speech, in which, after expressing his heartfelt
thanks to the Commissioners for 'an exercise of talent and
vigour never surpassed by any public servants', he gave a
comprehensive, massive, and most impressive summary of the
results of their labours. Few who were in the House on that
night will ever forget the effect produced when, urging on his
audience to consider the rapid progress of time, and the
appalling rapidity with which a child of nine years of age,
abandoned to himself, and to companions like himself, is added
to the ranks of viciousness, misery, and disorder in manhod,
he turned from the Speaker, and looking round on those of his
own order, exclaimed - 'You call these poor people improvident
and immoral, and so they are; but that improvidence and
immorality are the results of our neglect, and, in some
measure, of our example. Declare this night that you will
enter on a novel and a better course - that you will seek
their temporal through their eternal welfare - and the
blessing of God will rest upon your endeavours; and, perhaps,
the oldest among you may live to enjoy for himself and for his
children the opening day of the immortal, because the moral
glories of the British Empire.'
This appeal was met on the part of the Secretary of State for
the Home Deparment, Sir James Graham, by the answer that he
had matured a plan which might be regarded as the first effort
of Government to introduce a national system of education.
There were unquestionably elements of good in the education
clauses, particularly as they were altered in the course of
debate, and they might have formed the basis of institutions
expanding and improving by experience, until they were put in
harmony with the feelings, and became adequate to the wants of
the people; but, unfortunately, whatever may have been the
real intentions of the Minister, the announcement of his plan
had the effect of exciting in a violent degree the sectarian
animosities of the people; and after having arrayed from one
end of the kingdom to another in desperate conflict Churchman
against Dissenter, and Dissenter against Churchman, and
different sections of each against all the rest, terminated,
not only in the loss of any measure for education, but in the
defeat of the amendment of the Factory Act, to which the
Minister had attached his scheme of National Education.
Consequently, the evils resulting from ignorance, remain as
before. The Factory Act will, however, be amended. Government
announced on February 6, the intention of limiting the labour
of children, under thirteen, to six hours daily.
But although the opportunity of making a nationl provision for
education has for the present been lost, yet the exposure of
the total inadequacy of existing institutions for the
intellectual and moral training of the people, has not been
without a useful result. Within the space of a few months
after the publication of the Reports of the 'Children's
Employment Commission', and immediately after the failure of
the Government plan of education, the friends of the
Established Church raised in voluntary contributions an
educational fund amounting to nerly £200,000; and one
denomination of Dissenters (the Independents) at their first
meeting, subscribed towards a similar fund upwards of £17,000,
and pledged themselves to use their utmost exertions to
increse this sum to £100,000 in the space of five years. The
Methodists also have pledged themselves to raise £200,000 in
seven years, and found 700 schools; other bodies of Dissenters
have followed in the same track; so that the people have
already put to shame the 'National Grant of £30,000', the
utmost amount ever yet voted by Parliament for the education
of the country - a sum scarcely sufficient to defray the
expense of one convict ship, or to maintain for a year one
single prison!
The two commissions on which Dr Southwood Smith has been
engaged, have unavoidably turned his mind away from the
speculative studies which at one period occupied him more
exclusively, and have converted him from a thinker into a
worker. Circumstances connected with his profession had long
forced upon his observation the wretched state of the
dwellings of the poor, and this disease, suffering, and death
produced by the noxious exhalations that arise from the
unsewered, undrained, and uncleansed localities into which
their houses are crowded. 'Nature', said he, 'with her burning
sun, her stilled and pent-up wind, her stagnant and teeming
marsh, manufactures plague on a large and fearful scale:
poverty in her hut, covered with her rags, surrounded with her
filth, striving with all her might to keep out the pure air,
and to increase the heat, imitates nature but too
successfully; the the process and the product are the same,
the only difference is in the magnitude of the result'. In the
year 1837, this result was produced in certain of the
metropolitan districts to such an unusual extent as to attract
the attention of the Poor Law commissioners. They requested
Drs Southwood Smith, Arnott and Kay to investigate the cause.
The districts assigned to Dr Smith were Whitechapel and
Bethnal Green, and he adopted the plan of writing a literal
description of what he saw in his tour over these unknown
regions. Of the many pictures of squalid wretchedness
presented, the following may serve as specimens: -
An open area of about 700 feet in length,
and 300 in breadth; 300 feet of which are covered by
stagnant water, winter and summer. In the part thus
submerged, there is always a quantity of putrefying animal
and vegetable matter, the odour of which at the present
moment is most offensive. An open filthy ditch encircles
this place. Into this ditch all the . . . Nothing can be
conceived more disgusting than the appearance; and the odour
of the effluvia is at this moment most offensive.
Lamb's-fields is the fruitful source of fever to the houses
which immediately surround it, and to the small
streets which branch off from it. Particular houses were
pointed out to me from which entire families have been swept
away, and from several of the streets fever is never absent.
Of St John Street, a close and densely populated place, in
which malignant fever has prevailed in almost every house, he
says: -
In one room which I examined, eight feet by
ten and nine feet high, six people live by day and sleep at
night; the closeness and stench are almost intolerable. . .
. Alfred and Beckwith Rows consist of small buildings
divided into two houses, one back, the other front: each
house bieng divided into two tenements, occupied by
different families. these habitations are surrounded by a
broad open drain, in a filthy condition. Heaps of filth are
accumulated in the spaces meant for gardens in front of the
houses. . . . I entered several of the tenements. In one of
them, on the ground floor, I found six persons occupying a
very small room, two in bed, ill with fever. In this same
room a woman was carrying on the process of silk-winding . .
. . Campden-gardens: the dwellings are small ground-floor
houses, each containing two rooms, the largest about seven
feet by nine, the smallest barely large enough to admit a
small bed; the height about seven feet; in winter these
houses are exceedingly damp; the windows are very small;
there is no drainage of any kind; it is close upon a marshy
district. Often all the members of a family are attacked by
fever, and die one after the other.
These descriptions can only be compared to Howard's account of
the 'State of Prisons', fifty years ago. The jail fever was
then a recognized and prevalent disease; it is now only a
subject of history. So may the typhus fever of London be fifty
years hence. It requires only an enlightened legislature to
order, and efficient officers to enforce known remedies.
The impression produced by the entire Report, portions of
which have now been extracted, led to the motion made by the
Bishop of London, in the Session of 1839, for an extension of
the inquiry into the state of other towns in the United
Kingdom. Early in the following Session (1840), Mr Slaney
obtained a Select Committee of the House of Commons for
inquiring into the 'Health of Towns'. Dr Southwood Smith was
the first witness examined before this Committee, who largely
quote his 'valuable evidence' in their Report, and refer the
legislatiure to the important paper which he furnished to
them, entitled 'Abstract of a Report on the prevalence of
Fever in Twenty Metropolitan Unions during the year 1838',
which they reprinted in their Appendix.
The urgency of the case had now attracted the notice of
Government, and in particular had impressed the noble
Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Marquis of
Normanby;

____________________
From the Wikipedia:
Constantine Henry
Phipps, 1st Marquess of Normanby KG GCB GCH (May 15,
1797 – July 28, 1863) was a politician and author of the
United Kingdom. He was the son of Henry Phipps, 1st Earl of
Mulgrave (1755–1831) and great-grandson of Sir Constantine
Henry Phipps (1656–1723). He studied at Harrow and Trinity
College, Cambridge, where he was the second President of the
Cambridge Union Society, then sat for the family borough of
Scarborough when he attained his majority. However after
dissenting from the family politics, such as by speaking in
favour of Catholic emancipation, he resigned his seat and
lived in Italy for two years. On his return in 1822 he was
elected for Higham Ferrers and made a considerable reputation
by political pamphlets and by his speeches in the house. He
was returned for Malton at the general election of 1826,
becoming a supporter of Canning. He was already known as a
writer of romantic tales, The English in Italy (1825);
in the same year he made his appearance as a novelist with Matilda,
and in 1828 he produced another novel, Yes and No. He
succeeded his father as earl of Mulgrave in 1831. He was sent
out as Governor of Jamaica and was afterwards appointed Lord
Lieutenant of Ireland (1835–1839). He was created the first
marquess of Normanby on June 25, 1838, and held successively
the offices of colonial secretary and home secretary in the
last years of Lord Melbourne’s ministry. While Colonial
Secretary, he wrote a letter of instructions to William
Hobson, in which the government's policy for the sovereignty
of New Zealand was set out. From 1846 to 1852 he was
ambassador at Paris, to and
from 1854-1858 minister at Florence. The publication
in 1857 of a journal kept in Paris during the stormy times of
1848 (A Year of Revolution), brought him into violent
controversy with Louis Blanc, and he came into conflict with
Lord Palmerston and Mr Gladstone, after his retirement from
the public service, on questions of French and Italian policy.
He died in London on July 28, 1863. He had married in 1818 the
daughter of Thomas Henry Liddell, 1st Baron Ravensworth, and
was succeeded as marquess by his son George.
Thus he knew
the Brownings, who were in Florence from 1846-1861.
Southwood Smith, visiting his daugher Emily, Mazzini's
friend, in Florence in 1856, would likely have renewed his
friendship with Normanby.
____________
but like many
others, being unable to dismiss a doubt whether there were not
some exaggerations in these descriptions, he resolved to
verify their correctness by a personal inspection of the
districts in question. He accordingly accompanied Dr Southwood
Smith in a visit to Whitechapel and Bethnal Green, and was so
deeply affected by what he saw, that he declared his instant
conviction, that 'so far from any exaggeration having crept
into the descriptions which had been given, they had not
conveyed to his mind an adequate idea of the truth'; as indeed
no words can do. Lord Ashley afterwards performed the same
painful round in company with Dr Smith, and expressed himself
in a similar manner.*
___________
*These statements are strictly authentic. They went privately,
and unattended, into the most squalid and hideous abodes of
filth, and misery, and vice, and might well express themselves
strongly in public after what they witnessed. H.
___________
In the Session of 1841, Lord Normanby introduced into
Parliament his Bill for the 'Drainage of Buildings'; and in
his speech on moving the second reading of the Bill on
February 12, he acknowledged the services of Dr. Southwood
Smith, in the following terms. 'I cannot allude to them', he
said, 'without at once expressing my obligations to that
indefatigably benevolent gentleman for much useful information
which I have derived from him, with whom I have had the
satisfaction of much personal communication on this subject'.
The principal provisions of this Bill regarded the drainage of
houses, the regulation of the width of lanes and alleys, and
the form and conveniences of dwellings. The bishop of London
warmly supported the measure: - 'As presiding over the
spiritual interests of the metropolis, he felt deeply
interested in a Bill which he was satisfied would so
materially affect them: and being thoroughly convinced that
the physical condition of the poor was intimately connected
with their moral and religious state, and the two exerted a
mutual influence upon each other, he thankfully hailed the
present measure as the first step towards an elevation of that
class of the community in the scale of social comfort and
order'. Lord Ellenborough followed in the same spirit: - 'It
is idle,' said he, 'to build churches, to erect school-houses,
and to employ clergymen and schoolmasters, if we do no more.
Our first object should be to improve the physical condition
of the poor labourer, - to place him in a position in which he
can acquire self-respect; above all things to give him a
home'.
But before this measure had passed, there was a dissolution of
Parliament, and a change in the administration. The present
ministers have appointed a Commission of Inquiry into the
state of large towns and populous districts, with a view,
chiefly, to report on remedies; which remedies, however,
notwithstanding the urgency of the case are still delayed. In
an extended examination before these Commissioners Dr
Southwood Smith states that the disease formerly described by
him, still continues, and with increasing virulence; that a
new epidemic is now ravaging the metropolis, far more
extensive and fatal than the preceding; that the poorer
classes in their neglected districts, are still exposed to
causes of disease, suffering, and death which are peculiar to
them, and the malignant influence of which is steady,
unceasing, and sure. His words are too terrible to need any
comment: -
'The result', he says, 'is the same as if
twenty or thirty thousand of these people were annually
taken out of their wretched dwellings and put to death, the
actual fact being that they are allowed to remain in them
and die. I am now speaking of what silently, but surely,
takes place every year in the metropolis alone, and do not
include in this estimate the numbers that perish from these
causes in the other great cities, and in the towns and
villages of the kingdom. It has been stated that "the annual
slaughter in England and Wales, from preventible causes, of
typhus fever, which attacks persons in the vigour of life,
is double the amount of what was suffered by the allied
armies in the battle of Waterloo". This is no exaggerated
statement: this great battle against our people is every
year fought and won; and yet few take account of it, partly
for the very reason that it takes place every year. However
appalling the picture presented to the mind by this
statement, it may be justly regarded as a literal expression
of the truth. I am myself convinced from what I constantly
see of the ravages of this disease, that this mode of
putting the result does not give an exaggerated expression
of it. Indeed the most appalling expression of it would be
the mere cold statement of it in figures'.
In conclusion, Dr Smith enforced in earnest
language, the consideration that this whole class of evils is
remediable; that it does not belong to that description of
evil which is mingled with good in the conditions of our
being, but to that much larger sum of suffering, which is the
consequence of our own ignorance and apathy; -
'No government', said he, 'can prevent the
existence of poverty; no benevolence can reach the evils of
extreme poverty; under the circumstances which at present
universally accompany it; but there is ground of hope and
encouragement in the thought that the most painful and
debasing of those circumstances are adventitious, and form
no necessary and inevitable
part of the condition of that large class of every community
which must earn their daily bread by their manual labour.
These adventitious circumstances constitute the hardest part
of the lot of the poor, and these, as I have just said, are
capable of being prevented to a very large extent. The
labours of a single individual, I mean those of the
illustrious Howard, have at length succeeded in removing
exactly similar evils, though somewhat more concentrated and
intense, from our prisons; they are at least equally capable
of being removed from the dwelling houses and workplaces of
the people. Here there is a field of beneficient labour
which falls legitimately within the scope of the legislator,
and which is equally within that of the philanthropist,
affording a common ground beyond the arena of party strife,
in the culture of which all parties may united with the
absolute certainty that they cannot thus labour without
producing some god result, and that the good produced,
whatever may be its amount, must be unmixed good.'
Dr Smith is now
engaged with Lord Ashley and other influential and benevolent
men, in the formation of an Association for improving the
dwellings of the industrious classes, by the erection of
comfortable, cleanly, well-drained and ventilated houses, to
be let to families in sets of rooms, with an ample supply of
water on each floor; a fair return for the capital invested
being secured. Eleemosynary relief forms no part of the
undertaking, as tending to destroy the independence of those
whom it is designed to benefit. The association has fully
matured its plans, and will endeavour practically to show by
model-houses what may be done by combination to lessen the
expensiveness of the dwellings of the poor, and to increase
their healthfulness and comforts.
Though the sanatary conditions of the working classes has been
the especial object of Dr Southwood Smith of late years, he
has not forgotten the wants of the middle classes in the
season of sickness. These are not at first sight so obvious;
but there are circumstances which have never been sufficiently
considered, that place many, whose station in life removes
them above the evils of poverty, in a worse condition when
overtaken by disease than the poor who can obtain admission
into the hospitals. Numbers of the middle classes annually
leave their homes and families and flock to London, as to a
common centre, to find employment, or to complete their
education. Others resort to it from distant parts of the
country for medical or surgical advice. Strangers and
foreigners constantly visit it. When attacked by disease - a
close and comfortless lodging in a noisy street, with no
better attendance than the already overtasked servant of all
work, or a landlady, who begins to dread infection, or the
non-payment of her rent, - is the lot of many a delicately
minded and sensitive person in the pain of fever or
inflammation, with all the desolation of the feeling of
absence from home and friends.
Out of a sympathy with such sufferers, arose in Dr Smith's
mind the idea of founding an institution on the principles of
the great clubs, arranged with every requisite for a place of
abode in sickness, and provided with regular medical officers
and nurses; the principle of admission being, as in the case
of the clubs, a certain yearly subscription, and a fixed
weekly payment during residence in it. Such institutions are
not uncommon on the continent, though, until the present time,
none have existed in this country. That originated by Dr
Southwood Smith, under the name of the 'Sanatorium', was
opened in March, 1842, at Devonshire Place House in the New
Road. the house is well calculated for an experimental
attempt, but is not sufficiently large to carry out the
purposes which he contemplated. These would extend to suites
of rooms, kept at a regular temperature for consumptive cases,
and to a separate building for fever cases, which are now
totally excluded. It appears only to want greater publicity to
attain its full scope of usefulness; but unless supported by
the class for whom it is designed it cannot be maintained at
all. that such a club is certain to be well supported at some
period not far distance, we can plainly see; but the attempt
may be premature. Its founder - deriving no personal advantage
from the design, but devoting much time and labour to its
advancement - has rested its claim to public support simply on
the ground, that, as when the middle and higher classes
combine to found public schools and colleges, and to build and
endow churches, they solicit the contributions of the rich and
benevolent because no new thing, however excellent in itself,
or however affluent in the means of securing its ultimate
independence and prosperity, can be set on foot without some
capital; so this institution appeals to the public for
assistance, to enable it to mitigate suffering, to shorten the
duration of disease, and to save life. The Bank of England,
and the large and influential merchants' houses have seen the
good of the undertking, and have contributed largely to
promote it; nor should we omit to notice in particular the
strenuous exertions of Mr Thomas Chapman, the Chairman of the
Sanatorium Committee.
Amidst his many arduous and apparently endless labours, some
words of encouragement should be addressed to Dr Southwood
smith, who in his private station devotes himself to the
diffusion of philosophical truth, and to the instruction of
the people in some of the most practically interesting and
least understood parts of knowledge. He has described for them
the wonderful structures that form the outward and visible
machinery of life, and the still more wonderful results of its
action - the processes that constitute the vital functions. He
has shown the brighter portion of the height and depth of our
human nature in the Sources of Happiness, and has proved that
'in the entire range of the sentient creation, without a
single exception, the higher the organized structure, the
greater the enjoyment to which it ministers and in which it
terminates'. He has so expounded the philosophy of Pain, as to
communicate to the mourning and desponding, heart and hope,
and has taught in the noblest sense the uses of adversity. He
has still to deduce from the action of physical agents on
living structures the laws of health, and to expound the
intellectual and moral constitution based on the physical and
growing out of it; without a knowledge of which, neither the
mother nor the educator can avoid the most pernicious errors,
nor ultimately reach their goal. There are minds and hearts
that thank him for what he has already accomplished, and that
anxiously await the completion of his work.
By his public labours Dr Smith has awakened the attention of
the people at large, and of the legislature, to those physical
causes of suffering, disease, and premature death, which,
while they afflict the whole community, press with peculiar
severity on the poorer classes; and has shown not only that
these causes are removable, but the means by which human
wisdom and energy may certainly succeed in removing them And
he is peculiarly fitted to render services to the community on
this important subject, in consequence of his intimate
acquaintnce with that dreadful train of diseases which are
entailed on humanity by our inattention to removing the causes
of the febrile poison.
Lord Ashley is yet young, and few men have before them a more
noble, or more successul career. He has proved that he
possesses the qualities requisite for the performance of the
mission to which he has felt the vocation. He is not only
intellectual, but possessed of the greatest industry,
perseverance, and confidence in his cause, yet diffident of
himself from the very depth of his feeling concerning it; not
wanting in firmness, yet candid and conciliating, and though
earnest even to enthusiasm, tempering and directing the
impulses of zeal by a sober and sound judgement. His
singleness of purpose, his unquestioned sincerity and honesty,
his diligence in collecting facts, his careful sifting, lucid
arrangement, and concise and candid exposiiton of them, and
his plain unaffected language and unpretending address, have
secured him the deeply respectful attention even of the House
of Commons. Sustained in his appeals to that difficult
assembly by the profound consciousness that the cause he
advocates must engage on its side the sympathies of our common
humanity, on which he throws himself with a generous
confidence, he often produces the highest results of
eloquence. He has already calmed the fears of the capitalists;
conciliated the Government; engaged the co-operation of the
Legislature; placed under the protection of the Law the
children of the factories; placed under the protection of the
Law the still more helpless children doomed to the mines and
collieries; and to the female children and women, heretofore
confined therein, he has said - 'You are free, and shall do
the work of beasts in the attitude of beasts, no more'. Lord
Ashley has still to emancipate apprentices; to obtain a
general registration of accidents; to improve the localities
and dwellings of the poor; and to give the compensating
benefit of education to those whose early years are spent in
labour. Because the first attempts to accomplish these great
objects have failed, let no evasions, obstacles, delays,
discourage him, not let him -
Bate a jot, -
Of heart or hope; but still bear up and steer
Right onward.
'Hengist' Horne,
editor of the New Spirit of
the Age, also worked on this Royal Commission on the
Employment of Children in Mines and Factories, 1841-1843, and
Elizabeth Barrett Barrett wrote her moving 'The Cry of the
Children', read out in the House of Lords, eventually
incorporating the findings in her character of Marian Erle in Aurora Leigh, while Fanny
Trollope saw
conditions in England for English children as demonstrably
worse than for slaves on American plantations. Requested by Lord
Ashley to write in support of his work for children in
factories and mines, she published The Life and Adventures of Michael Armstrong,
Factory Boy, in 1840. She and Hervieu actually
travelled to the milltowns and she and he together witnessed
the most terrible scene in the book, where the starving
children working in the mill steal from the pigs their
swill.


Leigh Hunt's epitaph on Thomas Southwood
Smith's tomb speaks of his work in hygiene for the poor, his
stress upon the relationship of fever with poverty.
Ages shall honor, in
their hearts enshrined, thee,
SOUTHWOOD SMITH, Physician of
Mankind
Bringer of Air, Light, Health
into the home
Of the rich Poor of happier
years to come.
It would be discovered in 1909 that typhus, also
called 'Jail Fever', 'Hospital Fever', 'Ship Fever' and 'Famine
Fever', is caused by body lice or by rat fleas.
Though not discovering this specific aspect of the disease, the
work of Howard in the prisons and Southwood Smith in the slums
in their advocacy of hygiene were correct.
Scottish Unitarian Margaret Gillies has portraits of
Leigh
Hunt,
Hengist
Horne,
William
Wordsworth,
Mary Howitt and Southwood Smith (NPG
D8396), with whom she lived, in
the National Portrait Gallery. Likewise there is a portrait bust
by Joel T. Hart on Southwood Smith's tomb, below, while the
National Portrait Galley has another by that American sculptor (NPG
339).
*§
THOMAS SOUTHWOOD SMITH (1788-1861)/ ENGLAND/Southwood Smith/ M.D./ Tommaso/ Inghilterra/
Firenze/ 10 Dicembre/ 1861/ Anni
73/ 761/ Southwood Smith, l'Angleterre/ Southwood
Smith's granddaughter, Octavia Hill, continued his work,
introducing housing reform in slums]/ GL23777/1 N° 301, Rev
O'Neill/ In Memory of SOUTHWOOD SMITH, Physician/ who
through the promotion of sanitary/ reform in the principles
of which he was the first to discover and through other
philanthropic and literary labour was distinguished as a
Benefactor of Mankind/ Born at Martock, Somersetshire/ Dec
21, 1788, Died at Florence/ Dec 10, 1861// + THEN SHALL THE
RIGHTEOUS SHINE FORTH AS THE SUN IN THE KINGDOM/ OF THEIR
FATHER/ MATTHEW XII v.43// [Below Joel T. Hart's
sculpted portrait medallion] / Ages shall honor, in their
hearts enshrined, thee, SOUTHWOOD SMITH, Physician of
Mankind/ Bringer of Air, Light, Health into the home/ Of the
rich Poor of happier years to come/ Leigh Hunt/ D20I/ Sculptor: Joel Tanner Hart: Signature
on neck of bust:
J.T.HART
aa
WALTER SAVAGE
LANDOR WEBSITE:
Recordings of Gebir I, Gebir II || Essay 'Walter Savage Landor' in New Spirit of the Age || Jean Field, 'Walter Savage Landor's Warwick' || 'Black and Red Letter Chaucer' || Kate Field, Atlantic
Montly, 'The Last Days of
Walter Savage Landor' || Mark Roberts, 'The
Inscription on the Grave of Walter Savage Landor' || Alison Levy, 'The Widow of Walter Savage Landor'
|| Kristin Bragadottir, 'William Morris and Daniel
Willard Fiske' (Villa Landor) || Piero Fusi, 'A. Henry Savage Landor'.
WALTER SAVAGE
LANDOR
Let his page,
Which
charms the chosen Spirits of the Age,
Fold
itself up for a serener clime
Of years
to come, and find its recompense
In that
just expectation.
Shelley
alter Landor, when a Rugby boy, was famous, among
other feats of strength and skill, for the wonderful precision
with which he used a cast-net; and he was not often disposed
to ask permission of the owners of thos ponds or streams that
suited his morning's fancy. One day a farmer suddenly came
down upon him; and ordered him to desist, and give up his net.
Whereupon Landor instantly cast his net over the farmer's
head; caught him; entangled him; overthrew him; and when he
was exhausted, addressed the enraged and discomfited face
beneath the meshes, till the farmer promised to behave
discreetly. The pride that resented a show of intimidation,
the prudence that instantly foresaw the only means of
superseding punishment, and the promptitude of will and
action, are sufficiently conspicuous. The wilful energy and
self-dependent force of character displayed by Walter Landor
as a boy, and accompanied by physical power and activity, all
of which were continued through manhood, and probably have
been so, to a great extent, even up to the present time, have
exerted an influence upon his genius of a very peculiar kind:
- a genius healthy, but the healthfulness not always well
applied - resolute, in a lionlike sense, but not
intellectually concentrated and continuous: and seeming to be
capable of mastering all things except its own wilful
impulses.
Mr Landor
is a man of genius and learning, who stands in a position
unlike that of any other eminent individual of his time. He
has received no apparent influence from any one of his
contemporaries; nor have they or the public received any
apparent influence from him. The absence of any fixed and
definite influence upon the public is actually as it seems;
but that he has exercised a considerable influence upon the
minds of many of his contemporaries is inevitable, because so
fine a spirit could never have passed through any competent
medium without communicating its electric forces, although
from the very fineness of its elements, the effect, like the
cause, has been of too subtle a nature to leave a tangible or
visible impress.
To all
these causes combined is attributable the singular fact, that
although Walter Savage Landor has been before the public as an
author during the last fifty years, his genius seldom denied,
but long since generally recognized, and his present position
admissibly in that of the highest rank of authors - and no man
higher - there has never been any philosophical and critical
estimate of his powers. Admired he has often been abundantly,
but the admiration has only been supported by 'extract', or by
an off-hand opinion. The present paper does not pretend to
supply this great deficiency in our critical literature; it
will attempt to do no more than 'open up' the discussion.
Walter
Landor, when at Rugby school, was a leader in all things, yet
who did not associate with his schoolfellows - the infallible
sign of a strong and original character and course through
life. He was conspicuous there for his resistance to every
species of tyranny, either of the masters and their rules, or
the boys and their system of making fags, which things he
resolutely opposed 'against all odds'; and he was, at the same
time, considered arrogant and overbearing in his own conduct.
He was almost equally famous for riding out of bounds, boxing,
leaping, net-casting, stone-throwing, and for making Greek and
Latin verses. Many of these verses were repeated at Rugby
forty years after he had left the school. The 'master',
however, studiously slighted him so long, that when at last
the token was given of appreciation of certain Latin verses,
the indignant young classic being obliged to copy them out
fairly in the 'play-book', added a few more, commencing with,
-
Haec sunt malorum pessima carminum
Quot
Landor unquam scripsit; at accipe
Quae
Tarquini servas cloacam,
Unde
tuum, dea flava nomen, &
From
Rugby to Trinity College, Oxford, was the next remove of
Walter Savage Landor. He was 'rusticated' for firing off a gun
in the quadrangle; but as he never intended to take a degree,
he did not return. He left Oxford - let all the juvenile
entities who have taken up facile pens of judgement about Mr
Landor during the last ten years, tremble as they read, and
'doubt their own abilities' - in the summer of 1793, when he
put forth a small volume of poems. They were published by
Cadell, and it will not be thought very surprising that the
first poems of a young man, at that time quite unknown to the
world, should in the lapse of fifty years have become out of
print. His next performances may, with sufficient trouble, be
obtained. They are the poems of 'Gebir', Chrysaor', the
'Phoeacans', &c, and the very high encomiums passed upon
'Gebir' by Southey, with whom Landor was not acquainted till
some twelve years afterwards, were accounted as sufficient
fame by their author. Southey's eulogy of the poem appeared in
the Critical Review,
to the great anger of Gifford, whose translation of 'Juvenal'
was by no means so much praised in the same number. One of the
most strikingly characteristic facts in connexion with Mr
Landor is, that while he has declared his own doubts as to
whether Nature intended him for a poet, 'because he could
never please himself by anything he ever did of that kind', it
must be perfectly evident to everybody who knows his writings,
that he never took the least pains to please the public. The
consequences were almost inevitable.
After
leaving Trinity, Mr. Landor passed some months in London,
leanring Italian and avoiding all society; he then retired to
Swansea, where he wrote 'Gebir' - lived in comparative
solitude - made love - and was happy.
The
'attitude' in which the critical literati of the time received
the poem of 'Gebir', was very much the same as though such a
work had never been published. A well-written critique,
however, did appear as one exception, in a northern provincial
paper, in which Mr Landor was compared, in certain respects,
with Goethe; another we have also seen, which was full of
grandly eloquent and just expressions of appreciation -
printed, we believe, in Aberdeen, within two years since, and
signed G.G.; - but the earliest was written by Southey, as
previously stated. No doubt Mr Landor has read the latter, but
it is his habit (and one more common among authors of original
genius than is at all suspected) never to read critiques upon
himself. His feeling towards this department of literature may
be estimated by his offer of a hot penny roll and a pint of
stout, for breakfast (!) to any critic wh could write one of
his Imaginary Conversations - an indigestible pleasantry which
horribly enraged more than one critic of the time. Of 'Gebir',
however, Coleridge was accustomed to speak in terms of great
praise; till one day he herd Southey speak of it with equal
admiration, after which Coleridge altered his mind - 'he did not admire it - he must
have been mistaken'.
A few biographical memoranda of Mr Landor will be found
interesting, previous to offering some remarks on his genius
and works. During the time he was studying Italian in London,
after leaving Trinity, his godfather, General Powell, was
anxious that he should enter the army, for which he seemed
peculiarly adapted, excepting that he entertained republican
principles which 'would not do there'. This proposal being
negatived, his father offered to allow him £400 per annum, if
he would adopt the law and reside in the Temple; but declared
that he would allow him but little more than one-third of that
sum, if he refused. Of course Walter Landor well knew that he
might have enjoyed a gay London life with £400 per annum, in
the Temple, and neglected the law, as, here and there, a young
gentleman of the Temple is apt to do; he, however, preferred
to avoid false pretences, accepted the smaller income, and
studied Italian.
Mr Landor wrote verses in Italian at this period, which were
not very good, yet not perhaps worse than Milton's. The poetry
of Italy did not captivate his more severely classical taste
at first; he says it seemed to him 'like the juice of grapes
and melons left on yesterday's plate'. He had just been
reading Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Pindar. But his opinion was
altered directly he read Dante, which he did not do till some
years afterwards.
That his uncle was not so far wrong in thinking Landor well
suited to a military life, the following anecdote will serve
to attest. - At the breaking out of the Spanish war against
the French, he was the first Englishman who landed in Spain.
He raised a few troops at his own expense and conducted them
from Corunna to Aguilar, the head quarters of Gen. Blake,
Viceroy of Gallicia. For this he received the thanks of the
Supreme Junta in the Madrid
Gazette, together with an acknowledgement of the
donation of 20,000 reals
from Mr Landor. He returned the letters and documents, with
his commission, to Don Pedro Cevallos, on the subversion of
the Constitution by Ferdinand - telling Don Pedro that he was
willing to aid a people in their assertion of its liberties
against the antagonist of Europe, but that he could have
nothing to do with a perjuror and traitor.
Mr Landor went to Paris in the beginning of the century, where
he witnessed the ceremony of Napoleon being made Consul for
life, amidst the acclamations of multitudes. He subsequently
saw the detrhoned and deserted Emperor pass through Tours on
his way to embark, as he intended, for America. Napoleon was
attended only by a single servant, and descended at the
Prefecture, unrecognized by anybody except Landor. The people
of Tours were most hostile to Napoleon; Landor had always felt
a hatred towards him, and now he had but to point one finger
at him, and it would have done what all the artillery of
twenty years of war had failed to do. The people would have
torn him to pieces. Need it be said Landor was too 'good a
hater', and too noble a man, to avail himself of such an
opportunity. He held his breath, and let the hero pass.
Perhaps, after all, there was no need of any of this hatred on
the part of Mr Landor, who, in common with many other
excessively wilful men, was probably as much exasperated at
Napoleon's commanding successes, as at his falling off from
pure republican principles. Howbeit, Landor's great hatred,
and yet 'greater' forbearance are hereby chronicled.

In 1806, Mr Landor sold several estates in Warwickshire which
had been in his family nearly seven hundred years, and
purchased Lantony and Comjoy in Monmouthshire, where he laid
out nearly £70,000. Here he made extensive improvements,
giving employment daily, for many years, to between twenty and
thirty labourers in building and planting. He made a road at
his own expense, of eight miles long, and planted and fenced
half a million trees. The infamous behaviour of some tenants
caused him to leave country. At this time, he had a million
more trees all ready to plant, which, as he observed, 'were
lost to the country by driving me from it. I may speak of their utility, if I must
not of my own'. The two chief offenders were brothers who
rented farms of Mr Landor to the amount of £1,500 per annum,
and were to introduce an improved system of Suffolk husbandry.
Mr Landor got no rent from them, but all manner of atrocious
annoyances. They even rooted up his trees, and destroyed whole
plantations. They paid nobody. When neighbours and workpeople
applied for money, Mr Landor says, 'they were referred to the
Devil, with their wives and families, while these brothers had
their two bottles of wine upon the table. As for the Suffolk
system of agriculture, wheat was sown upon the last of May,
and cabbages for winter food were planted in August or
September. Mr Landor eventually remained master of the field,
and drove his tormentors across the seas; but so great was his
disgust at these circumstances that he resolved to leave
England. Beofre his departure he cause his house, which had
cost him some £8,000, to be taken down, that his son might
never have the chance of similar vexations in that place.
In 1811, Mr Landor married Julia, the daughter of J. Tuillier
de Malaperte, descendant and representative of the Baron de
Neuve-ville, first gentleman of the bedchamber to Charles the
Eighth. He went to reside in Italy in 1815, and during several
years occupied the Palazzo Medici, in Florence. Subsequently
he purchased the beautiful and romantic villa of Count
Gherardesca at Fiesole, with its gardens and farms, scarcely a
quarter of an hour's walk from the ancient villa of Lorenzo
de' Medici, and resided there many years in comparative
solitude.

Of the difference
between the partialities of the public, and the eventual
judgements of the people; between a deeply-founded fame and
an ephemeral interest, few more striking examples will
perhaps be discovered in future years than in the solitary
course of Walter Savage Landor amidst the various 'lights of
his day'. He has incontestably displayed original genius as
a writer; the highest critical faculty - that sympathy with
genius and knowledge which can only result from imagination
and generous love of truth - and also a fine scholarship in
the spirit as well as the letter of classical attainments.
But the public, tacitly, has denied his claims, or worse -
admitted them with total indifference, - letting fall from
its benumbed fingers, work after work, not because any one
ventured to say, or perhaps even to think, the books were
unworthy, but because the hands were cold. A writer of
original genius may be popular in his lifetime, as sometimes
occurs, by means of certain talents and tacts comprehended
in his genius; by the aid of startling novelties, or by
broad and general effects; and by the excitement of
adventitious circumstances; - on which ground is to be
worked the problem of Lord Byron's extensive popularity with
the very same daily and yearly reading public that made
mocks and mows at Coleridge, and Wordsworth, and Shelley,
and Keats. But, as a general rule, the originality of a man,
say and do what he may, is necessarily in itself an argument
against his rapid popularity. In the case of Mr Landor,
however, other causes than the originality of his faculty have
opposed his favour with the public. He has the most select
audiences perhaps, - the fittest, fewest, - of any
distinguished author of the day; and this of his choice. 'Give
me', he said in one of his prefaces, 'ten accomplished men for
readers, and I am content'; - and the event does not by any
means so far as we could desire, outstrip the modesty, or
despair, or disdain, of this aspiration. He writes criticism
for critics, and poetry for poets: his drama, when he is
dramatic, will suppose neither pit nor gallery, not critics,
nor dramatic laws. He is not a publican among poets - he does
not sell his Amreeta cups upon the highway.He delivers them
rather with the dignity of a giver, to ticketed persons;
analysing their flavour and fragrance with a learned delicacy,
and an appeal to the esoteric. His very spelling of English is
uncommon and theoretic. He has a vein of humour which by its
own nature is pecularly subtle and evasive; he therefore
refines upon it, by his art, in order to prevent anybody
discovering it without a grave, solicitous, and courtly
approach, which is unspeakably ridiculous to all the parties
concerned, and which no doubt the author secretly enjoys. And
as if poetry were not, in English, a sufficiently unpopular
dead languages, he has had recourse to writing poetry in
Latin; with dissertations on the Latin tongue, to fence it out
doubly from the populace. 'Odi profanum vulgus, et arceo'.
Whether Mr Landor writes Latin or English, poetry or prose, he
does it all with a certain artistic composure, as if he knew
what he was doing, and respected the cunning of his right
hand. At times he displays an equal respect for his
wilfulness. In poetry, his 'Gebir', the 'Phocaeans' and some
other performances take a high classic rank. He can put out
extraordinary power both in description and situation; but the
vitality, comprehended in the power, does not overflow along
the inferior portions of the work, so as to sustain them to
the level of the reader's continued attention. the poet rather
builds up to his own elevations than carries them out and on:
and the reader passes from admiration to admiration, by
separate estates or shocks, and not by a continuity of
interest through the intervals of emotion. Thus it happens
that his best dramatic works, -those, the impression of which
on the mind is most definite and excellent, - are fragmentary;
and that his complete dramas are nt often read through twice,
even by readers who applaud them, but for the sake of a
particular act or scene.
A remark should be made on Mr Landor's blank verse, in which
the poems just named, and several others are written. It is
the very best of the regular syllable class, the versification
of 'numbers', as they have been characteristically called by
the schools. His blank verse is not only the most regular that
ever was written, but it is the most sweet, and far less
monotonous than we should expect of a musical system which
excluded occasional discords. It has all the effect of the
most melodious rhyming heroic verse: indeed, it often gives
the impression of elegiac verses in rhyme. As blank verse it
is a very bad model. There is more freedom in his dramatic
verse, and always the purest style.
His dramatic works (except the compact little scenes entitled
'Pentalogia', which are admirable) are written upon an
essentially undramatic principle; or, more probably, on no
principle at all. Mr Landor well knows 'all the laws', and
they seem to provoke his will to be lawless. In this species
of drama-looking composition he displays at times the finest
passion, the most pure and perfect style of dramatic dialogue,
and an intensity of mental movements, with their invisible,
undeclared, yet necessarily tragic results.ì; all of
which proves him to possess the most wonderful
three-fourths of a great dramatic genius which ever appeared
in the world. But the fourth part is certainly wanting by way
of making good his ground to the eyes, and ears, and
understanding of the masses. In his Andrea of Hungary the action does not
commence till the last scene of the third act; and is not
continued in the first scene of the fourth! Instead of the
expected continuation, after all this patience, the confounded
reader has his breath taken away by the sauntering entrance of
Boccaccio - the novelist - accompanied by Fiametta, who having
nothing whatever to do with the drama, the former sings her
little song! This extremely free-and-easy style of treading
the boards is so very new and delightful that it excites the
idea of continuing
the scene by the introduction of the Genius of the Drama, with
a paper speech coming out of his mouth, on which is inscribed
the Laws of Concentration and Continuity, the Laws of
Progressive action and the Art of construction. To whom, Enter
the Author, with a cast-net.
He makes his cast to admiration; trips up the heels of the
Genius of the Drama, and leaves it sprawling. It is his own
doing.
In whatever Mr Landor writes, his power, when he puts it
forth, is of the first order. He is classical in the highest
sense. His conceptions stand out, clearly cut and fine, in a
magnitude and nobility as far as possible removed from the
small and sickly vagueness common to this century of letters.
If he seems obscure at times, it is from no infirmity or
inadequacy of thought or word, but from extreme concentration,
and involution in brevity - for a short string can be tied in
a knot, as well as a long one. He cen be tender, as the strong
can best be; and his pathos, when it comes, is profound. His
descriptions are full and startling; his thoughts,
self-produced and bold; and he has the art of taking a
commonplace under a new aspect, and of leaving the Roman
brick, marble. In marble indeed, he seems to work: for there
is an angularity in the workmanship, whether of prose or
verse, which the very exquisiteness of the polish renders more
conspicuous. You may complain too of hearing the chisel: but
after all, you applaud the work - it is a work well done. The
elaboration produces no sense of heaviness, - the severity of
the outline does not militate against beauty; - if it is cold,
it is also noble - if not impulsive, it is suggestive. As a
writer of Latin poems, he ranks with our most successful
scholars and poets; having less harmony and majesty than
Milton had, - when he aspired to the species of 'Life in
Death', - but more variety and majesty of utterance. Mr
Landor's English prose writings possess most of the
characteristics of his poetry: only they are more perfect in
their class. His 'Pericles and Aspasia', and 'Pentameron' are
books for the world and for all time, whenever the world and
time shall come to their senses about them: complete in beauty
of sentiment and subtlety of criticism. His general style is
highly scholastic and elegant, - his sentences have
articulations, if such an expression may be permitted, of very
excellent proportions. And, abounding in striking images and
thoughts, he is remarkable for making clear the ground around
them, and for lifting them, like statues to pedestals, where
they may be seen most distinctly, and strike with the most
enduring though often the most gradual impression. This is the
case both in his prose works and his poetry. It is more
conspicuously true of some of his smaller poems, which for
quiet classic grace and tenderness, and exquisite care in
their polish, may best be compared with beautiful cameos and
vases of the antique.
Two works should be mentioned - one of which is only known to
a few among his admirers, and the other not at all. Neither of
them were published, and though printed they were very little
circulated. The first is entitled, 'Poems from the Arabic and
Persian'. They pretended to be translations, but were written
by Landor for the pleasure of misleading certain orientalists
and other leanred men. In this he succeeded, and for the first
time in the known history of such hoaxes, not to the discredit
of the credulous, for the poems are extremely beautiful, and
breathe the true oriental spirit throughout. They are ornate
in fancy, - graceful, and full of unaffected tenderness. They
were printed in 1800, with many extremely erudite notes; in
writing which, the author, no doubt, laughed very much to
himself at the critical labour and searching they would
excite. The other production is called 'A Satire upon
Satirists, and Admonition to Detractors', printed in 1836. It
contins many just indignations, terrible denunciations, and
cleaving blows against those who used not many years since to
make a rabid crusade upon all genius; but the satire
occasionally makes attacks upon some who do not deserve to be
so harshly treated by a brother author: and we cannot but
rejoice that this satire (in its present state) has not been
published.
Mr Landor's wit and humour are of a very original kind, as
previously remarked. Perhaps in none of his writings does
their peculiarity occur so continuously as in a series of
Letters, entitled 'High and Low Life in Italy'. Every sarcasm,
irony, jest, or touch of humour, is secreted beneath the skin
of each tingling member of his sentences. His wit and his
humour are alike covered up amidst various things, apparently
intended to lead the reader astray, as certain birds are wont
to do when you approach the nests that contain their broods.
Or, the main jests and knotty points of a paragraph are planed
down to the smooth level of the rest of the sentences, so that
the reader may walk over them without knowing anything of the
matter. All this may be natural to his genius; it may also
result from pride, or perversity. So far from seeking the
public, his genius has displayed a sort f apathy, if not
antipathy, to popularity; therefore, the public must court it,
if they would enjoy it; to possess yourself of his wit you
must scrutinize; to be let into the secret of his humour you
must advance 'pointing the toe'. such are the impressions
derivable from Mr Landor's writings. In private social
intercourse nothing of the kind is apparent, and there are few
men whose conversation is more unaffected, namely, pleasing,
and instructive.
The imagination of Mr Landor is richly graphic, classical and
subtly refined. In portraying a character, his imagination
identifies itself with the mentality and with the emotions of
its inner being, and all those idiosyncracies which may be
said to exist between a man and himself., but with which few,
if anybody else, have any business. In other respects, most of
his characters - especially those of his own invention - might
live, think, move, and have their being in space, so little
does their author trouble himself with their corporeal
conditions. Whether it be that their author feels his own physique so strongly that
it does not ocur to him that any one else can need such a
thing - he will find all that for them - or that it is the
habit of his genius to abstract itself from corporeal
realities (partly from the perverse love a man continually has
of being his own 'opposite'), and ascend into a more subtle
element of existence, - certain it is that many of his
characters are totally without material or definite form; appear to live
nowhere, and upon nothing, and to be very independent agents,
to whom the practical action seldom or never occurs. 'They
think, therefore they are'. They feel, and know (they are apt
too often to knw as much as their author) therefore they are
characters. But they are usually without bodily substance; and
such form as they seem to have, is an abstraction which plays
round them, but might go off in air at any time, and the loss
be scarcely apparent. The designs of his larger works, as
wholes, are also deficient in compactness of form, precision
of outline, and condensation. They often seem wild, not at all
intellectually, but from ungoverned will. It is difficult not
to arrive at conclusions of this kind - though different minds
will, of course, see differently - after a careful study of
the dramas of Andrea of
Hungary, Giovanna
of Naples, and Fra
Rupert; the Pericles
and Aspasia, the Pentemeron
and Pentalogia, &c. The very title of the
'Imaginary Conversations' gives a strong foretaste of Mr
Landor's predominating ideality, and dismissal of mortal bonds
and conditions. The extraordinary production last named are as
thoguh their author had been rarified while listening to the
conversation, or th double soliloquies, of august Shades; all
of which he had carefully written down on resuming his
corporeality, and where his memory failed him he had supllied
the deficiency with some sterling stuff of his own. The
Landorean 'peeps' seen through these ethereal dialogues and
soliloquies of the mighty dead, are seldom to be mistaken; and
though hardly at times in accordance with their company, are
seldom unworthy of the highest.
As a partial exception to some of the foregoing remarks should
be mentioned the 'Examination of William Shakespeare before
Sir Thomas Lucy, Knt. touching Deer-stealing'. Of all the
thousands of books that have been issued from the press about
Shakespeare, this one of Mr Landor's is by far the most
admirable. It is worth them all. There is the high-water mark
of genius upon every page, lit by as true a sun as ever the
ocean mirrored. Perfect and inimitable from beginning to end,
that it has not become the most popular of all the books
relating to Shakespeare, is only to be accounted for by some
perversity or dullness of the public. The book is, certainly,
not read. There is great love and reading bestowed upon every
cant about Shakespeare, and much interst has been shown in all
the hoaxes. Perhaps the public thought this book was
authentic.
Other stars await other discoveries. Few
and solitary, and wide asunder, are those who calculate
their relative distances, their mysterious influences, their
glorious magnitude, and their studendous height. 'Tis so,
believe me, with the truest and best poetry. Homer they say
was blind; he might have been ere he died; that he sat among
the blind, we are sure . . . Be patient! From the higher
heavens of poetry, it is long before the radiance of the
brightest star can reach the world below. We hear that one
man finds out one beauty, another man finds out another,
placing his observatory and instruments on the poet's grave.
The worms must have eaten us before it is rightly known what
we are It is only when we are skeletons that we are boxed
and ticketed, and prized and
shown.
Landor, 'Examination of William Shakespeare'.
In an age of criticism like this, when to 'take' a position
over a man and his work is supposed to include proportionable
superior powers of judgement, though not one discovery,
argument, or searching remark, be adduced in proof; when
analysis is publicly understood to mean everything that can be
done for the attainment of a correct estimate, and the very
term, alone, of synthesis looks pedantic and outre; and when any
anonymous young man may gravely seat himself, in the fancy of
his unknowing readers, far above an author who may have
published works - of genius, learning, or knowledge and
experience, at the very period that his We Judge was perhaps
learning to write at school, - it is only becming in an
attempt like that of the present paper, to disclaim all
assumption of finality of judgement upon a noble veteran of
establisehd genius, concerning whom there has never yet been
one philosophically elaborated criticism. To be the first to
'break ground' upon the broad lands of the the authors of
characters and scenes from real life, is often rather a
perilous undertaking for any known critic who values his
reputation; but to unlock the secret chambers of an ethereal
inventiveness, and pronounce at once upon its contents, would
only manifest the most short-sighted presumption. Simply to
have unlocked such chambers for the entrance of others, were
task enough for one contemporary.
Any sincere and mature opinions of the master of an art are
always valuable, and not the less so when commenting upon
established reputations, or those about which a contest still
exists. We may thus be shaken in our faith, or confirmed in
it. Mr Landor's mode of expressing his opinion often amounts
to appealing to an inner sense for a corroboration of the
truth. He says, in a letter to a friend, 'I found the "Faery
Queen" the most delightful book in the world to fall asleep
upon by the seaside. Geoffrey Chaucer always kept me wide
awake, and beat at a distance all other English poets but
Shakespeare and Milton. In many places Keats approaches him'.
After remarking on the faults and occasional affectations
discoverable in two or three of the earliest poems of that
true and beautiful genius, Mr Landor adds that he considers
'no poet (always excepting Shakespeare) displays so many happy
expressions, or so vivid a fancy as Keats. A few hours in the
Paecile with the Tragedians would have made him all he wanted
- majestically sedate. I wonder if any remorse has overtaken
his murderers'.
Mr Landor is not at all the product of the present age; he
scarcely belongs to it; he has no direct influence upon it:
but he has been an influence to some of its best teachers, and
to some of the most refined illustrators of its vigorous
spirit. For the rest - for the duty, the taste, or the favour
of posterity - when a succession of publics shall have slowly
accumulated a residuum of 'golden opinions' in the shape of
pure admiring verdicts of competent minds, then only, if ever,
will he attain his just estimation in the not altogether
impartial roll of Fame. If ever? - the words fell from the pen
- and the manly voice of him to whom they were applied, seems
to call from his own clear altitude, 'Let the words remain'.
For in the temple of posterity there have hitherto always
appeared some immortalities which had better have burnt out,
while some great works, or names, or both, have been suffered
to drift away into oblivion. That such is likely to be the
fate of the writings of Walter Savage Landor, nobody can for a
moment believe; but were it so destined, and he could foresee
the result, one can imagine his taking a secret pleasure in
this resolution of his works into their primitive elements.
*§° WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR/ ENGLAND/ Landor/ Gualtiero Savage/
/ Inghilterra/ Firenze/ 17 Settembre/ 1864/ Anni 90/ 879/ Walter
Savage Landor, l'Angleterre/ GL23777/1 N° 348 Burial 19/09, Rev
Pendleton/ Freeman, 223/ Thomas Adolphus Trollope, What
I Remember, II.244-262, notes Landor and the Garrows knew
each other well from Devon days, gives Landor's letter about Kate
Field's Atlantic Monthly article mentions the Alinari
photograph of himself/ NDNB entry/ Giuliana
Artom Treves, Golden Ring, pp. 38-53 °=Gen. Pier Lamberto Negroni Bentivoglio/ IN MEMORY OF/ WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR/
BORN 30th OF JANUARY 1775/ DIED 17th OF SEPTEMBER 1864/ AND THOU
HIS FLORENCE TO THY TRUST/ RECEIVE AND KEEP/ KEEP SAFE HIS
DEDICATED DUST/ HIS SACRED SLEEP/ SO SHALL THY LOVERS COME FROM
FAR/ MIX WITH THY NAME/ MORNING STAR WITH EVENING STAR/ HIS
FAULTLESS FAME/ A.G. SWINBURNE/ F9E/ Barfucci says
original slab replaced in 1946

WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR
WEBSITE:
Recordings of Gebir I, Gebir II || Essay 'Walter Savage Landor' in New Spirit of the Age || Jean Field, 'Walter Savage Landor's Warwick' || 'Black and Red Letter Chaucer'
|| Kate Field, Atlantic
Montly, 'The Last Days of
Walter Savage Landor' || Mark Roberts, 'The
Inscription on the Grave of Walter Savage Landor' || Alison Levy, 'The Widow of Walter Savage Landor'
|| Kristin Bragadottir, 'William Morris and Daniel
Willard Fiske' (Villa Landor) || Piero Fusi, 'A. Henry Savage Landor'.
FRANCES TROLLOPE
See 'Iron
Chain: Golden Ring'
No sooner did the
Housekeeper see them than she ran out of the room in
great haste, and immediately returned with a pot of holy
water and a bunch of hyssop, and said, 'Signor
Licentiate, take this and sprinkle the room, lest some
enchanter, of the many these books abound with, should
enchant us, in revenge for what we intend to do in
banishing them out of the world!' The Priest smiled at
the Housekeeper's simplicity, and ordered the Barber to
reach him the books, one by one, that they might see
what they treated of; for, perhaps they might find some
that did not deserve to be chastized by
fire.
Don Quixote
orne's
A New Spirit of the Age discusses
Fanny
Trollope in an essay with several other novelists. And the
writer of the essay is extremely disparaging of her, so much so
that Horne expostulates in a footnote. Who wrote the essay? I
suspect Elizabeth Barrett Browning, touched to the quick by the
episode in Jonathan Jefferson
Whitelaw where a heroine discovers she is part Black
and consequently overdoses on laudanum. Too close to the bone.
The class to which [Mrs Trollope] belongs is,
fortunately, very small; but it will always be recruited from
the ranks of the unscrupulous, so long as a corrupt taste is
likely to yield a trifling profit. She owes everything to that
audacious contempt of public opinion, which is the
distinguishing mark of persons who are said to stick at nothing. Nothing
but this sticking at nothing could have produced some of the
books she has written, in which her wonderful impunity of face
is so remarkable. Her constitutional coarseness is the natural
element of a low popularity, and is sure to pass for
cleverness, shrewdness and strength, where cultivated
judgement and chaste inspiration would be thrown away.*
______________
*Still, we submit that the critic does not admit enough on the
other side. We think Mrs. Trollope is clever, shrewd, and strong. H.
______________
Her books of travel are crowded with plebeian criticisms on
works of art and the usages of courts, and are doubtless held
in great esteem by her admirers, who love to see such things
overhauled and dragged down to their own level. The book on
America is of a different class. The subject exactly suited to
her style and her taste, and people looked on at the fun as
they would at a scramble of sweeps in the kennel; while the
reflecting few thought it a little unfair in Mrs. Trollope to
find fault with the manners of the Americans. Happy for her
she had such a topic to begin with. Had she commenced her
literary career with Austria or France, in all likelihood she
would have ended it there.
But it is to her novels she is chiefly indebted to her current
reputation; and it is here her defects are most glaringly
exhibited. She cannot adapt herself to the characterization
requisite in a work of fiction: she cannot go out of herself:
she serves up everything with the same sauce: the predominant
flavour is Trollope still. The plot is always preposterous,
and the actors in it seem to be eternally bullying each other.
She takes a strange delight in the hideous and revolting, and
dwells with gusto upon the sins of vulgarity. Her
sensitiveness upon this point is striking. She never omits an
opportunity of detailing the faults of low-bred people, and
even goes out of her way to fasten the stigma upon others who
ought to have been more gently tasselled. Then her low people
are sunk deeper than the lowest depths, as if they had been
bred in and in, the last dregs. Nothing can exceed the
vulgarity of Mrs. Trollope's mob of characters, except the
vulgarity of her select aristocracy. That is transcendant - it
caps the climax.
We have heard it urged on behalf of Mrs. Trollope that her
novels are, at all events, drawn from life. So are
sign-paintings. It is not great proof of their truth that
centaurs and griffins do not run loose through her pages, and
that her men and women have neither hoofs and tails. The
tawdriest waxworks, girt up in paste and spangles, are also
'drawn from life'; but there ends the resemblance.
On behalf of Mrs Trollope we could add that she wrote the first
anti-slave novel in Jonathan
Jefferson Whitlaw, a major novel against the abuse of
children in Michael Armstrong
Factory Boy, and a major novel against clergy abuse in
The Vicar of Wrexhill.
While her commissioning of Hiram Powers in Cincinnati to do
waxworks of Dante's Commedia
was the start of his internationally distinguished career as a
sculptor, his 'Greek Slave' at the centre of the 1851 Crystal
Palace Exhibition. She is coeval with Jane Austen. She is deeper
than Jane Austen. Her style is Regency, her sentiments of the
Civil Rights era. It was under her roof, in Room 36
of the Villino Trollope, that George Eliot wrote Romola.
*§ FRANCES (MILTON) TROLLOPE (1780-1863)/
ENGLAND/
Trolloape [Trollope] nata Milton/ Vedova Francesca/ Guglielmo/
Inghilterra/ Firenze/ 6 Ottobre/ 1863/ Anni 84/ 849/ Françoise
Veuve Trolloope, l'Angleterre, fille de Revd. Guillaume Milton,
et de Marie, née Gressley, son épouse/ FRANCESCAE TROLLOPE/
QUOD MORTALE FUIT/ HIC IACET/ . . . / MEMORIA/ NULLUM
MARMOR QUAERIT/ APUD STAPLETON/ IN AGRO SOMERSET ANGLORUM/
A.D. 1780 NATA/ FLORENTIAE/ TUMULUM A.D.1863/ NACTA EST/ On
the Trollopes in Florence, see Giuliana Artom Treves, Golden
Ring, passim, ° archival holdings; Thomas Adolphus
Trollope writes the Latin of the inscriptions for his mother,
his wife, his father-in-law; GL23777/1 N° 337 Burial 08/10 Age
84 Rev Pendleton / Thomas Adolphus
Trollope, What I Remember, I & II/ NDNB entries
for Trollopes, etc./ F11E


Tom, Fanny, Bice, and Theodosia Trollope
in Villino Trollope, Piazza
dell'Indipendenza
See also Fanny Trollope in America and Italy: http://www.florin.ms/trollope.html
ELIZABETH
BARRETT BROWNING/ MISS E.B. BARRETT

As one who drinks from a charmed cup
Of foaming and sparkling and murmuring wine
Which a
mighty Enchantress, filling up,
Invites to love with her lips divine.
Shelley
he latter
lady, or 'fair shade' - whicever she may be - is not known
personally, to anybody, we had almost said; but her poetry
is known to a highly intellectual class, and she 'lives' in
constant correspondence with many of the most eminent
persons of the time. When, however, we consider the many
strange and ingenious conjectures that are made in after
years concerning authors who appeared but little among their
contemporaries, of of whose biography little is actually
known, we should not be in the least surprised, could we
lift up our ear out of our grave a century hence, to hear
some learned Thebans expressing shrewd doubts as to whether
such an individual as Miss E.B. Barrett had ever really
existed. Letters and notes, and exquisite English lyrics,
and perhaps a few elegant Latin verses, and spirited
translations from Aeschylus, might all be discovered under
that name; but this would not prove that such a lady had
ever dwelt among us. Certain admirable and erudite prose
articles on the 'Greek Chrsitian Poets' might likewise be
ascertained by the exhumations of sundry private letters and
documents, touching periodical literature, to have been from
the hand of that same 'Valerian'; but neither the poetry,
nor the prose, not the delightfully gossiping notes to fair
freinds, not the frank correspondence with scholars, such as
Lady Jane Grey might have written to Roger Ascham - no, not
even if the great-grandson of some learned Jewish doctor
could show a note in Hebrew (quite a likely thing really to
be extant), with the same signature, darkly translated by
four letters, - nay, though he should display as a relic
treasured in his family, the very pen, with its oblique
Hebraic nib, that wrote it - not any one, nor all of those
things coud be sufficient to demonstrate the fact that such
a lady had really adorned the present century.
In such chiaroscuro, therefore,
as circumstances permit, we will endeavour to offer
sufficient grounds for our reader's belief, to the end that
posterity may at least have the best authorities and
precedents we can furnish. Confined entirely to her own
apartment, and almost hermetically sealed, in consequence of
some extremely delicate state of health, the poetess of whom
we write is scarcely seen by any but her own family. But
though thus separated from the world - and often, during
many weeks at a time, in darkness almost equal to that of
night, Miss Barrett has yet found means by extraordinary
inherent energies to develope her inward nature; to give
vent to the soul in a successful struggle with its destiny
while on earth; and to attain and master more knowledge and
accomplishments than are usually within the power of those
of either sex who possess every adventitious opportunity, as
well as health and industry. Five years of this imprisonment
she has now endured, not with vain repinings, though deeply
conscious of the loss of external nature's beauty; but with
resignation, with patience, with cheerfulness, and generous
sympathies towards the world without; - with indefatigable
'work' by thought, by book, by the pen, and with devout
faith, and adoration, and a high and hopeful waiting for the
time when this mortal frame 'putteth on immortality'.
The period when a strong
prejudice existed against learned ladies and 'blues' has
gone by, some time since; yet in case any elderly objections
may still exist on this score, or that some even of the most
liberal-minded readers may entertain a degree of doubt as to
whether a certain austere exclusiveness and ungenial
pedantry might infuse a slight tinge into the character of
ladies possessing Miss Barrett's attainments, a few words
may be added to prevent erroneous impressions on this score.
Probably no living individual has a more extensive and
diffuse acquaintance with literature - that of the present
day inclusive - than Miss Barrett. Although she has read
Plato, in the original, from beginning to end, and the
Hebrew Bible from Genesis to Malachi (nor suffered her
course to be stopped by the Chaldean),
yet there is probably not a single good romance of the most
romantic kind in whose marvellous and impossibile scene she
has not delighted, over the fortunes of whose immaculate or
incredible heroes and heroines she has not wept; not a clever
novel or fanciful sketch of our own day, over the brightest
pages of which she has not smiled inwardly, or laughed
outright, just as their authors themselves could have desired.
All of this, our readers may be assured, that we believe to be
as strictly authentic as the very existence of the lady in
question, although, as we have already confessed, we have no
absolute knowledge of this fact. But lest the reader should
exclaim, 'Then, after all,
there really may be no such person!' we should bear witness to
having been shown a letter of Miss Mitford's to a friend, from
which it was plainly to be inferred that she had actually seen
and conversed with her. The date has unfortunately escaped us.
He compares Mrs. Norton and Miss Barrett:
The prominent characteristics of these two poetesses
may be designated as the struggles of woman towards happiness,
and the struggles of a sould towards heaven. The one is
oppressed with a sense of injustice, and feels the need of
human love; the other is troubled with a sense of mortality,
and aspires to identify herself with ethereal existences. The
one has a certain tinge of morbid despondency taking the tone
of complaint and the amplificaiton of private griefs; the
other too often displays an energetic morbidity on the subject
of death, together with a certain predilection for 'terrors'.
The imagination of Mrs. Norton is chiefly occupied with
domestic feelings and images, and breathes melodious plaints
or indignations over the desecrations of her sex's loveliness;
that of Miss Barrett often wanders amidst the supernatural
darkness of Calvary sometimes with anguish and tears of blood,
sometimes like one who echoes the songs of triumphal choirs.
Both possess not only great mental energies, but that
description of strength which springs from a fine nature, and
manifests itself in productions which evidently originated in
genuine impulses of feeling. The subjects they both choose
appear spontaneous, and not resulting from study or imitation,
though cast into careful moulds of art. The one records and
laments the actual; the other creates and exults in the ideal.
Both are excellent artists: the one dealing with subjects of
domestic interest; the other in designs from sacred subjects,
poems of religious tendency, or of the supernatural world. Mrs
Norton is beautifully clear and intelligible in her narrative
and course of though and feeling; Miss Barrett has great
invenitveness, but not an equal peer in construction. The one
is all womanhood; the other all wings. Mrs Norton is strong in
actual experiences, and her smpathies are carried beyond them,
even into the hard and painful scenes of juvenile labours, as
evidenced in her 'Voice from the Factories', first published
in 1836. Miss Barrett is rich in the memory of early
experiences, but more rich in imaginations and ethereal
aspirations, and would shrink from the contemplation of
unrefined realities. The one writes from the dictates of the
human heart in all the eloquence of beauty and individuality;
the other like an inspired priestess - not without a most
truthful heart, but a heart that is devoted to religion, and
whose individuality is cast upward in the divine afflatus, and
dissolved, and carried off in the recipient breath of
angelic ministrants.
One reason for Elizabeth not having admitted Richard 'Hengist'
Horne to her presence, though being perfectly willing to
collaborate in a lively correspondence with
him on his work for the report to the Royal Commission on the
Labour of Children in Mines and Factories, as well as towards
the production of this book, is that she heard he was bald.
Somewhere she remarks that a bald Hamlet is unthinkable! But was
not Shakespeare bald? This is Margaret Gillies' portrait of
'Hengist' Horne (NPG
2168). Instead Elizabeth Barrett
proposed, in Lady
Geraldine's Courtship, to Tennyson and to Browning.
*§ ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING (1806-1861)/ JAMAICA/ENGLAND/ 79. Barrett
Browning/ Elisabetta/ / Inghilterra/ Firenze/ 29 Giugno/ 1861/
Anni 45 [incorrect, 55]/ 737/ Elisabeth Barrett Browning,
l'Angleterre, agé de 45 ans/ [marble with leading, design, Lord
Leighton, execution, Luigi Giovanozzi (1791-1870), sculptor of
Duchess of Albany's tomb, Santa Croce, who signs the work to the
bottom left]/ GL23777/1 N°293 Burial 01/07
Rev O'Neill; Anthony Webb: heart attack, morphine poisoning;
Freeman, 236-23/ NDNB article /Henderson/ E.B.B./
OB.1861./E12I / FRANCESCO
GIOVANNOZZI FECE
[See Biblioteca e Bottega Fioretta Mazzei
for books by and about Elizabeth Barrett Browning]

Harp shown with broken slave shackle at left,
flowers at right.
See
also Elizabeth Barrett Browning Website: http://www.florin.ms/ebbwebsite.html
FLORIN WEBSITE
© JULIA
BOLTON HOLLOWAY, AUREO ANELLO
ASSOCIAZIONE, 1997-20242:
MEDIEVAL: BRUNETTO
LATINO, DANTE
ALIGHIERI, SWEET NEW
STYLE: BRUNETTO
LATINO, DANTE ALIGHIERI, &
GEOFFREY CHAUCER || VICTORIAN:
WHITE
SILENCE: FLORENCE'S 'ENGLISH'
CEMETERY || ELIZABETH
BARRETT BROWNING || WALTER
SAVAGE LANDOR || FRANCES
TROLLOPE || || HIRAM POWERS
|| ABOLITION
OF SLAVERY || FLORENCE IN
SEPIA || CITY
AND BOOK CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
I, II, III, IV, V, VI,
VII
|| MEDIATHECA
'FIORETTA MAZZEI' || EDITRICE
AUREO
ANELLO CATALOGUE
|| FLORIN
WEBSITE || UMILTA
WEBSITE || LINGUE/LANGUAGES:
ITALIANO,
ENGLISH
|| VITA
New: Dante vivo || White Silence

Florentine Lily on Elizabeth Barrett Browning's Tomb